John Glick

17 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

John Glick
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Applied Mathematics 145
  • Numerical Analysis 45
  • Computer Science Applications 22
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 59
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 72
Replace Mourad Nachaoui with:
Mourad Nachaoui Morocco
Yanpeng Zheng China
Roger Webster United Kingdom
三郎 齋藤
Edward Neuman United States
Lihong Zhi China
C. K. Mesztenyi United States
V. Maiorov Israel
Jorma K. Merikoski Finland
Ali Çivril Türkiye
John Glick relative to Mourad Nachaoui Morocco Mourad Nachaoui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mourad Nachaoui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Glick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Glick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Glick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Glick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Glick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Glick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Glick. The network helps show where John Glick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside John Glick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Glick Line = papers co-authored together John Glick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1996124
2 199842
3 198738
4 201325
5 200015
6 200213
7 20009
8 20066
9 20026
10 20024
11
Total least norm for linear and nonlinear structured problems
19974
12 20003
13 19912
14
Peer instruction in the CS classroom: a hands-on introduction: conference tutorial
20111
15 20151
16 20121
17 20161
18 19940

About John Glick

John Glick is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computer Science Applications, Numerical Analysis, Education and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical and numerical algorithms (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (4 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (145 citations), Numerical Analysis (45 citations), Computer Science Applications (22 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (59 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (72 citations). John Glick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. B. Rosen, Haesun Park, Pãnos M. Pardalos, Daniel P. Sheehan, Leo Porter, Cynthia Taylor, J. D. Means, Saturnino Garcia, Ryuta Tobe and Robert S. Maier. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Optimization, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Optimization and Engineering, Computing and Journal of Global Optimization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact