John Ford

7.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
134 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

John Ford is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Numerical Analysis. According to data from OpenAlex, John Ford has authored 134 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 18 papers in Numerical Analysis. Recurrent topics in John Ford's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (28 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (17 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (17 papers). John Ford is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (28 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (17 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (17 papers). John Ford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. John Ford's co-authors include Clare Bambra, Ryan Riordan, Fiona E. Matthews, Issam A. R. Moghrabi, Nicholas Steel, Hiroshi Yabe, Yasushi Narushima, Mohamed Abdel‐Fattah, Graeme MacLennan and Alison Avenell and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

John Ford

126 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 400 800 1.2k

Peers

John Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Surgery 461
  • Health 452
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 408
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 391
Replace Michael Green with:
Michael Green Canada
Karan P. Singh United States
William W. Davis United States
Arthur V. Peterson United States
Paul S. Levy United States
Steven A. Smith United States
J. Chilcott United Kingdom
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen United States
Philippe Michel France
Thomas J. Hoerger United States
Michael Green Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John Ford
John Ford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John Ford
John Ford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ford. The network helps show where John Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Ford. John Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 0
5 0
6 3
7 7
8 3
9 4
10 1
11 2
12 3
13 5
14 3
15 23
16 7
17 16
18 123
19 1
20
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Incision Mini-Slings versus Standard Mid-Urethral Slings in Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026