Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Distribution of the Vitamin D receptor and 1α-hydroxylase in human brain
Countries citing papers authored by Steven A. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven A. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven A. Smith. The network helps show where Steven A. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven A. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven A. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven A. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven A. Smith. Steven A. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pakhomov, Serguei, et al.. (2011). The role of the electronic medical record in the assessment of health related quality of life.. PubMed Central.7 indexed citations
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (2008). International Commercial Dispute Resolution. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 42(2). 363.1 indexed citations
Smith, Steven A.. (1993). THE SUBURBAN PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DILEMMA. TR news.1 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (1992). EVALUATION OF INFORM: LESSONS LEARNED AND APPLICATION TO OTHER SYSTEMS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.7 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Steven A. & R L Knoblauch. (1987). GUIDELINES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CROSSWALK MARKINGS (DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE). Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (1985). CREATION OF DATA SETS TO STUDY MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC FLOW IN FREEWAY BOTTLENECK SECTIONS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.5 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (1984). TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAY SAFETY. Public roads. 48(2).3 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Steven A.. (1983). PARK-AND-RIDE AT SHOPPING CENTERS: A QUANTIFICATION OF MODAL-SHIFT AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.2 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (1981). SERVICE AND SUPPLY TRIPS AT FEDERAL INSTITUTIONS IN WASHINGTON, D.C., AREA. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.4 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Steven A.. (1978). PLEA FOR CONSISTENCY IN PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL TIMING. ITE journal. 48(11). 33–37.1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (1977). Selection of pedestrian signal phasing. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 629(629). 1–6.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.