Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE)
Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Michel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Michel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Michel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Michel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Michel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Michel. The network helps show where Philippe Michel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philippe Michel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philippe Michel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philippe Michel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philippe Michel. Philippe Michel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Trombert‐Paviot, Béatrice, et al.. (2020). Stroke Care in Brazil and France: National Policies and Healthcare Indicators Comparison. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Encaoua, David, Philippe Michel, & Michel Moreaux. (2016). Network Compatibility: Joint Adoption Versus Individual Decisions. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 51–69.
Runciman, W. B., G. Ross Baker, Philippe Michel, et al.. (2008). The epistemology of patient safety research. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 6(4). 476–486.24 indexed citations
11.
Michel, Philippe, et al.. (2003). Developing Healthcare Quality Indicators in a Psychiatric Hospital. 15(1). 99–113.1 indexed citations
12.
Vidal, Jean‐Pierre, Pierre‐André Jouvet, & Philippe Michel. (2002). Droits de propriété sur l'environnement et accumulation du capital : une perspective coasienne. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 137–152.2 indexed citations
13.
Michel, Philippe, et al.. (2001). Pension funds and capital accumulation. Economics bulletin. 4(1). 1–8.4 indexed citations
14.
Lerebours, Éric, Philippe Michel, & Pierre Déchelotte. (1999). Quel niveau de preuve de l'efficacité des régimes en pathologie digestive ?. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 23.2 indexed citations
15.
Michel, Philippe & Pierre Pestieau. (1999). Social security and early retirement in an overlapping-generations growth model. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.28 indexed citations
16.
Crettez, Bertrand, Claire Loupias, & Philippe Michel. (1997). Croissance et modes de propriete des terres. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 119–146.1 indexed citations
Michel, Philippe, et al.. (1994). Éducation et croissance.. Revue d économie politique. 104(4). 457–499.2 indexed citations
19.
Pagliano, G, et al.. (1994). Paragangliomes de l'organe de Zuckerkandl.. Chirurgie. 120(3).3 indexed citations
20.
Michel, Philippe, et al.. (1992). Les télévisions en Europe. Presses Universitaires de France eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.