G Mowatt
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment 5
- Urology 4
- Co-authors
- Cynthia FraserJeremy GrimshawRuth ThomasLiz ShirranRoberto GrilliAndy OxmanLisa BeroMary Ann O’Brien
- Journals
- Health Technology Assessment (17 papers)International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (4 papers)PharmacoEconomics (2 papers)Research Synthesis Methods (2 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
G Mowatt
57 papers receiving 5.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 87
- General Health Professions 1.4k
- Internal Medicine 201
- Ophthalmology 435
- Urology 297
Countries citing papers authored by G Mowatt
This map shows the geographic impact of G Mowatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Mowatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Mowatt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G Mowatt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Mowatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Mowatt. The network helps show where G Mowatt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G Mowatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 245 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 187 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 167 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 188 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 338 | |
| 14 | The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 421 |
| 15 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 142 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 12 |
About G Mowatt
G Mowatt is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Urology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Nephrology and Ophthalmology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (8 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (87 citations), General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Internal Medicine (201 citations), Ophthalmology (435 citations) and Urology (297 citations). G Mowatt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia Fraser, Jeremy Grimshaw, Ruth Thomas, Liz Shirran, Roberto Grilli, Andy Oxman, Lisa Bero, Mary Ann O’Brien, Emma Harvey and Jonathan Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, PharmacoEconomics, Research Synthesis Methods and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.