John F. Scott

34 total papers · 800 total citations
21 papers, 541 citations indexed

About

John F. Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Scott has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 541 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in John F. Scott's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Archaeology and Natural History (1 paper) and Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper). John F. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Archaeology and Natural History (1 paper) and Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper). John F. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. John F. Scott's co-authors include F. H. C. Marriott, William Scott, Ruth Scott, Pitirim A. Sorokin, Talcott Parsons, Melvin Delgado, Howard E. Freeman and Jackson Toby and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Problems.

In The Last Decade

John F. Scott

20 papers receiving 416 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
John F. Scott 255 85 46 41 40 21 541
Thomas Grund 251 1.0× 85 1.0× 32 0.7× 18 0.4× 42 1.1× 18 580
Hua Wang 318 1.2× 92 1.1× 35 0.8× 18 0.4× 30 0.8× 15 553
John H. Rohrer 196 0.8× 133 1.6× 62 1.3× 49 1.2× 58 1.4× 19 537
Jos Jaspars 314 1.2× 233 2.7× 37 0.8× 38 0.9× 47 1.2× 20 613
Avelie Stuart 281 1.1× 127 1.5× 85 1.8× 16 0.4× 67 1.7× 29 565
Dennis H. Nagao 201 0.8× 129 1.5× 33 0.7× 91 2.2× 41 1.0× 20 486
Tim Phillips 338 1.3× 67 0.8× 23 0.5× 18 0.4× 33 0.8× 33 516
Donald R. Ploch 208 0.8× 37 0.4× 44 1.0× 16 0.4× 23 0.6× 22 465
Ryan Light 296 1.2× 48 0.6× 34 0.7× 18 0.4× 47 1.2× 26 540
Jay Folberg 254 1.0× 94 1.1× 88 1.9× 22 0.5× 31 0.8× 21 465

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Scott. The network helps show where John F. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Scott. John F. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026