John F. Post

515 citations
25 papers · 261 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John F. Post

22 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

John F. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • History and Philosophy of Science 91
  • Philosophy 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
  • General Psychology 5
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 34
Replace Dagfinn Føllesdal with:
Dagfinn Føllesdal Norway
Lewis E. Hahn United States
Ruth Mattern United States
Gerald J. Massey United States
Peter Remnant Canada
Horace Μ. Κallen United States
Wolfgang Schwarz United Kingdom
Tomis Kapitän United States
Antoine Arnauld
George N. Schlesinger United States
John F. Post relative to Dagfinn Føllesdal Norway Dagfinn Føllesdal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dagfinn Føllesdal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Post. The network helps show where John F. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside John F. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John F. Post Line = papers co-authored together John F. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989100
2 199331
3 198830
4 198024
5
Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction
199818
6 199513
7 19987
8 19847
9 19705
10
Is Supervenience Asymmetric
19994
11 20004
12 20063
13 20032
14 19842
15 19732
16 19842
17 19961
18 20041
19 19951
20
From Is to Ought: Another Way
20001

About John F. Post

John F. Post is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (91 citations), Philosophy (115 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (34 citations). John F. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. A. Hooker, Richard M. Gale, Keith Campbell, Ruth Garrett Millikan, Derek Turner, John Bacon, John Heil, Keith Lehrer, Paul K. Moser and Daniel Bonevac. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Journal of Philosophical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact