George N. Schlesinger
- Philosophy top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- L. Nathan OaklanderBrian I. CarrWilliam G. LycanPaul HelmGraham MacdonaldArdon LyonEdward WierengaPhilip L. Quinn
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
George N. Schlesinger
52 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Philosophy 154
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 116
- History and Philosophy of Science 102
- Cognitive Neuroscience 44
- Artificial Intelligence 37
Countries citing papers authored by George N. Schlesinger
This map shows the geographic impact of George N. Schlesinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George N. Schlesinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George N. Schlesinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George N. Schlesinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George N. Schlesinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George N. Schlesinger. The network helps show where George N. Schlesinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George N. Schlesinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George N. Schlesinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George N. Schlesinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George N. Schlesinger. George N. Schlesinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | Metaphysics: Methods and Problems | 5 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About George N. Schlesinger
George N. Schlesinger is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (102 citations), Philosophy (154 citations) and General Decision Sciences (22 citations). George N. Schlesinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. Nathan Oaklander, Brian I. Carr, William G. Lycan, Paul Helm, Graham Macdonald, Ardon Lyon, Edward Wierenga, Philip L. Quinn and Ronald E. Santoni. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.