Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Hunter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Hunter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Hunter. The network helps show where John E. Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Hunter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Hunter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Hunter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Hunter. John E. Hunter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mace, Pamela M., John E. Hunter, Nancy E. Kohler, et al.. (2021). NMFS / Interagency Working Group Evaluation of CITES Criteria and Guidelines.. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization).
Hunter, John E., et al.. (2013). Teaching for a Safer World: Lessons from the World Peace Game.. 72(2).1 indexed citations
4.
Hunter, John E., et al.. (2011). 'Defining the archaeological resource on the Isle of Harris: an assessment of the impact of environmental factors and topography on the identification of buried remains'. 4.1 indexed citations
Burke, Simon P. & John E. Hunter. (2007). The Wold Representation, Degree of Non-Cointegration, and the Johansen Trace Test. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
8.
Beirne, John, John E. Hunter, & Mark Simpson. (2007). Is the Real Exchange Rate Stationary? The Application of Similar Tests for a Unit Root in the Univariate and Panel Cases. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
9.
Hunter, John E.. (2002). Trans Fatty Acids: Effects and Alternatives. Food technology. 56(12). 140.2 indexed citations
10.
Hunter, John E., et al.. (2001). Soft computing in investment appraisal. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London). 214–219.2 indexed citations
Geyer, Paul, Virginia A. Johnson, & John E. Hunter. (1998). Empowering Career Decision-Making: A Practical Strategy for Using Occupational Information. Journal of rehabilitation. 64(4). 23.
13.
Hunter, John E.. (1998). The Jesuit Series: Part One (A–D) ed. by Peter M. Daly and G. Richard Dimler, SJ (review). University of Toronto Quarterly. 68(1). 443–444.
Hunter, John E. & Mike Allen. (1992). Adaptation to electronic mail. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 20(3). 254–274.19 indexed citations
16.
Hunter, John E., Stanley Cohen, & Jeffrey E. Danes. (1984). Change in single attitudes and cognitive structure. Academic Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
Hunter, John E. & D.C.W. Sanderson. (1982). The Snartemo/Kempston problem. Fornvännen. 77(1). 22–28.1 indexed citations
19.
Hunter, John E.. (1981). The works of John Hunter. Readex Microprint eBooks.27 indexed citations
20.
Danes, Jeffrey E., et al.. (1980). Evaluating Marketing Communication Strategies: Attribute Importance Versus Transfer Discrepancy. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.