John Denton
Impact in
- Archeology top 5%
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Nephrology top 10%
- Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases 5
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Eline M.J. Schotsmans (4 shared papers)A. S. Wilson (4 shared papers)J. Fletcher (2 shared papers)Robert C. Janaway (2 shared papers)Jessica Dekeirsschieter (1 shared paper)Geert J. Behets (1 shared paper)Murielle Salomé (1 shared paper)Marc E. De Broe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pancreas (2 papers)Forensic Science International (2 papers)Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (1 paper)Blood Purification (1 paper)Kidney International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
John Denton
14 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Archeology 78
- Nephrology 49
- Insect Science 68
- Space and Planetary Science 6
- Nutrition and Dietetics 45
Countries citing papers authored by John Denton
This map shows the geographic impact of John Denton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Denton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Denton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Denton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Denton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Denton. The network helps show where John Denton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Denton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 5 | Long-term effects of hydrated lime and quicklime on the decay of human remains using pig cadavers as human body analogues : field experiments | 2014 | 32 |
| 6 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 |
About John Denton
John Denton is a scholar working on Archeology, Nephrology, Insect Science, Earth-Surface Processes and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 14 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paleopathology and ancient diseases (5 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (2 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (78 citations), Nephrology (49 citations), Insect Science (68 citations), Space and Planetary Science (6 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (45 citations). John Denton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eline M.J. Schotsmans, A. S. Wilson, J. Fletcher, Robert C. Janaway, Jessica Dekeirsschieter, Geert J. Behets, Murielle Salomé, Marc E. De Broe, Line Oste and Steven Verberckmoes. Their work appears in journals such as Pancreas, Forensic Science International, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Blood Purification and Kidney International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.