John Deigh

1.8k citations
37 papers · 469 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • War, Ethics, and Justification

Papers in

John Deigh

32 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

John Deigh
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Philosophy 170
  • General Psychology 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 190
  • Social Psychology 192
  • Religious studies 21
Replace John Haldane with:
John Haldane United Kingdom
Christine Tappolet Canada
Gabriele Taylor United Kingdom
Edith Stein United States
Thomas C. Brickhouse United States
Joel Smith United Kingdom
Daniel Statman Israel
Heather Battaly United States
Karsten R. Stueber United States
George Pitcher Australia
John Deigh relative to John Haldane United Kingdom John Haldane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
John Haldane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Deigh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Deigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Deigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Deigh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Deigh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Deigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Deigh. The network helps show where John Deigh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside John Deigh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Deigh Line = papers co-authored together John Deigh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994123
2 198348
3 199548
4 201048
5
Ethics and personality : essays in moral psychology
199221
6 199620
7 199618
8 201415
9 200915
10 200211
11 200610
12 20019
13 20089
14 20139
15 20049
16 20118
17 19827
18 19846
19 19915
20 20124

About John Deigh

John Deigh is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 37 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (9 papers), Free Will and Agency (8 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (170 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (190 citations), Social Psychology (192 citations) and Religious studies (21 citations). John Deigh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include H. L. A. Hart. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics, Utilitas, Emotion Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of the history of philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact