Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Are There Any Natural Rights?
1955580 citationsH. L. A. HartThe Philosophical Reviewprofile →
Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals
1958555 citationsH. L. A. HartHarvard Law Reviewprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of H. L. A. Hart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. L. A. Hart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. L. A. Hart more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. L. A. Hart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. L. A. Hart. The network helps show where H. L. A. Hart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. L. A. Hart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. L. A. Hart.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. L. A. Hart based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. L. A. Hart. H. L. A. Hart is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hart, H. L. A.. (2013). Konsep hukum = the concept of law.17 indexed citations
2.
Hart, H. L. A.. (2007). Derecho, libertad y moralidad: Las conferencias Harry Camp en la Universidad de Stanford (1962). Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
3.
Kelsen, Hans, et al.. (1999). Pure theory of law . The concept of law.1 indexed citations
4.
Green, Leslie & H. L. A. Hart. (1996). The Concept of Law Revisited. Michigan Law Review. 94(6). 1687–1687.21 indexed citations
5.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1990). Law and morals. Oxford University Press eBooks. 63–70.1 indexed citations
Hart, H. L. A.. (1980). El nuevo desafío al positivismo jurídico. Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales. 3–18.5 indexed citations
11.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1980). Entre el principio de utilidad y los derechos humanos. 7–28.2 indexed citations
12.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1975). Definition & theory in jurisprudence : an inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 30 May, 1953. Clarendon Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
13.
Bentham, Jeremy & H. L. A. Hart. (1970). Of laws in general. Medical Entomology and Zoology.61 indexed citations
14.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation).260 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Stuart M. & H. L. A. Hart. (1963). The Concept of Law.. The Philosophical Review. 72(2). 250–250.20 indexed citations
16.
Hart, H. L. A., et al.. (1962). Causation in the Law.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 12(46). 92–92.5 indexed citations
Hart, H. L. A.. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review. 71(4). 593–593.555 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1953). I: Justice. Philosophy. 28(107). 348–352.
20.
Hart, H. L. A.. (1951). A Logician's Fairy Tale. The Philosophical Review. 60(2). 198–198.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.