George Pitcher

1.1k citations
22 papers · 430 indexed · h-index 11

George Pitcher

18 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

George Pitcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Philosophy 166
  • History and Philosophy of Science 36
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 89
  • Language and Linguistics 39
Replace Dorrit Cohn with:
Dorrit Cohn United States
Vincent M. Colapietro United States
J. N. Mohanty United States
Raziel Abelson United States
Aaron Ridley United Kingdom
William F. Vallicella United States
Ishani Maitra United States
G. J. Warnock United Kingdom
Ernst Tugendhat Germany
Paul Faulkner United Kingdom
George Pitcher relative to Dorrit Cohn United States Dorrit Cohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Dorrit Cohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Pitcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Pitcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Pitcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Pitcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Pitcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Pitcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Pitcher. The network helps show where George Pitcher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside George Pitcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Pitcher Line = papers co-authored together George Pitcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201514
2 20100
3
The death of spin
200214
4 199369
5 19865
6 19791
7 197232
8 19708
9 197019
10 197032
11 19701
12 19691
13 196915
14
Wittgenstein : the philosophical investigations : a collection of critical essays
19687
15
Die Philosophie Wittgensteins : eine kritische Einführung in den Tractatus und die Spätschriften
19671
16 196642
17 196587
18 196522
19 19611
20 19602

About George Pitcher

George Pitcher is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (166 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations) and Language and Linguistics (39 citations). George Pitcher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georg Henrik von Wright, Sydney Shoemaker, Alice Ambrose, Antony Flew, Garth Hallett, Michael K. Morgan and J. O. Urmson. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026