John Dagenais

406 citations
18 papers · 124 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Medieval Iberian Studies 11
    • Medieval Literature and History 5
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 6

John Dagenais

11 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

John Dagenais
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Classics 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
  • History 46
  • Religious studies 18
  • General Arts and Humanities 2
Replace Marina S. Brownlee with:
Marina S. Brownlee United States
Gregory B. Kaplan United States
Gerald Morgan Ireland
John Monfasani United States
Robert M. Durling
Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo Spain
John M. Ganim United States
Glyn S. Burgess United Kingdom
John Freccero United States
Jeanette Beer United States
John Dagenais relative to Marina S. Brownlee United States Marina S. Brownlee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Marina S. Brownlee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Dagenais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Dagenais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Dagenais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Dagenais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Dagenais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Dagenais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Dagenais. The network helps show where John Dagenais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside John Dagenais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Dagenais Line = papers co-authored together John Dagenais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199467
2 200028
3 19967
4 19947
5 20044
6 19913
7 19912
8 19841
9 20131
10 19861
11
The Imaginative faculty and artistic creation in Lope
19811
12 19921
13 19891
14 19900
15
El amor y el proceso creador en Lope de Vega
20130
16 19870
17 19950
18 19890

About John Dagenais

John Dagenais is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Iberian Studies (11 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (6 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (71 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations), History (46 citations), Religious studies (18 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). John Dagenais has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic Review, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, MLN, Modern Language Quarterly and Comparative Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact