Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

1.5k papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (892 papers), History (340 papers) and Classics (215 papers) specifically the topics of Early Modern Spanish Literature (551 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (352 papers) and Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (202 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies are Martin Maiden, Keith Whinnom, Melveena McKendrick, María Martínez Lirola, Edward C. Riley, Ian MacPherson, Jo Labanyi, Ian MacKenzie, D. Gareth Walters and Angus MacKay.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin of Hispanic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025