John D. Hodges
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter L. LorioEmile S. GardinerT. Evan NebekerWilliam F. WatsonWayne K. ClatterbuckStanley J. BarrasJames S. MeadowsAndrew W. Ezell
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (24 papers)Seedling growth and survival studies (22 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John D. Hodges
44 papers receiving 872 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 578
- Ecology 556
- Global and Planetary Change 423
- Insect Science 403
- Plant Science 253
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Hodges
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Hodges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Hodges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Hodges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Hodges
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Hodges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Hodges. The network helps show where John D. Hodges may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Hodges
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Hodges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Hodges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Hodges. John D. Hodges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twenty-nine years of development in planted cherrybark oak-sweetgum mixtures: implications for future mixed-species hardwood plantations | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Evaluation of Nuttall oak and cherrybark oak survival by planting stock and site preparation treatment type in a WRP planting on a retired agricultural site | 5 |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 93 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Comparative gas-exchange in leaves of intact and clipped, natural and planted cherrybark oak ( Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings | 1 |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About John D. Hodges
John D. Hodges is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (22 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (578 citations), Insect Science (403 citations) and Ecology (556 citations). John D. Hodges has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter L. Lorio, Emile S. Gardiner, T. Evan Nebeker, William F. Watson, Wayne K. Clatterbuck, Stanley J. Barras, James S. Meadows, Andrew W. Ezell, Robert L. Johnson and Steven H Bullard. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.