John D. Dimoff

15 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

John D. Dimoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 140
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
  • General Psychology 9
  • Social Psychology 113
  • Clinical Psychology 92
Replace Perilou Goddard with:
Perilou Goddard United States
Mervyn K. Wagner United States
Unnati Patel Canada
Derek Pope United States
Jessica G. Irons United States
Mitchell L. Schare United States
Nicole M. Bekman United States
A. C. Carr United Kingdom
Aleksander Pulver Estonia
Vanessa Morris Canada
John D. Dimoff relative to Perilou Goddard United States Perilou Goddard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Perilou Goddard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Dimoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Dimoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Dimoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Dimoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Dimoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Dimoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Dimoff. The network helps show where John D. Dimoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Dimoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Dimoff Line = papers co-authored together John D. Dimoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012216
2 201246
3 201622
4 201120
5 201120
6 201718
7 201616
8 201514
9 201810
10 20218
11 20195
12 20194
13 20214
14 20202
15 20222
16 20250

About John D. Dimoff

John D. Dimoff is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Media Influence and Health (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (140 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Social Psychology (113 citations) and Clinical Psychology (92 citations). John D. Dimoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Sayette, Kasey G. Creswell, John M. Levine, Catharine E. Fairbairn, Richard L. Moreland, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Bryan W. Heckman, Thomas Kirchner, John C. Norcross and Robert E. Ferrell. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Aging Studies, Clinical Psychological Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact