Paul B. Ingram

718 total citations
58 papers, 472 citations indexed

About

Paul B. Ingram is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul B. Ingram has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 472 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in Epidemiology and 12 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Paul B. Ingram's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (17 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (15 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers). Paul B. Ingram is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (17 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (15 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers). Paul B. Ingram collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Paraguay. Paul B. Ingram's co-authors include James W. Lichtenberg, Brian P. Cole, Patrick Armistead‐Jehle, Mary E. Oehlert, Anthony M. Tarescavage, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, Howard P. Wills, Adam Schmidt, Richard Mason and Matthew R. Reynolds and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Psychological Assessment and Addictive Behaviors.

In The Last Decade

Paul B. Ingram

49 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul B. Ingram United States 12 253 147 86 54 51 58 472
Brock Boudreau Canada 7 267 1.1× 100 0.7× 75 0.9× 25 0.5× 46 0.9× 7 519
Mariel S. Bello United States 16 170 0.7× 100 0.7× 63 0.7× 104 1.9× 20 0.4× 37 542
Kristie L. Gore United States 13 269 1.1× 71 0.5× 85 1.0× 38 0.7× 35 0.7× 39 479
Stephanie K. Takamatsu United States 9 183 0.7× 143 1.0× 38 0.4× 78 1.4× 58 1.1× 14 411
Thad Q. Strom United States 12 362 1.4× 205 1.4× 59 0.7× 28 0.5× 26 0.5× 20 543
Jillian Halladay Canada 12 304 1.2× 170 1.2× 92 1.1× 66 1.2× 27 0.5× 44 570
Gisèle Contreras Canada 10 232 0.9× 91 0.6× 82 1.0× 53 1.0× 15 0.3× 31 541
F. Jackie June ter Heide Netherlands 13 585 2.3× 67 0.5× 76 0.9× 18 0.3× 56 1.1× 31 693
Alexandra Kenna United States 10 226 0.9× 245 1.7× 67 0.8× 12 0.2× 22 0.4× 17 562
Hannah K. Allen United States 11 141 0.6× 170 1.2× 74 0.9× 65 1.2× 16 0.3× 31 429

Countries citing papers authored by Paul B. Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul B. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul B. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul B. Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul B. Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul B. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul B. Ingram. The network helps show where Paul B. Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul B. Ingram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul B. Ingram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul B. Ingram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul B. Ingram. Paul B. Ingram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ingram, Paul B. & Brian P. Cole. (2026). Commentary on Well-Being: Adolescent Development and Its Implications for Hedonic and Eudaimonic Traditions. Journal of Personality Assessment. 108(2). 304–306.
2.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Over-Reporting Scales and Supplemental Indicators. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 47(3).
3.
4.
Shura, Robert D., Paul B. Ingram, Ryan W. Schroeder, & Patrick Armistead‐Jehle. (2025). Interpreting the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity scales: Leveraging population-level Veteran Affairs (VA) data from 2008 to 2024.. Psychological Assessment. 37(12). 671–684.
5.
Morgan, Robert D., et al.. (2024). Reception to and Efficacy of a Serious Video Game for Correctional Intervention: Project Choices. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 51(11). 1635–1653.
6.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2024). Cross validation of the response bias scale and the response bias scale-19 in active-duty personnel: use on the MMPI-2-RF and MMPI-3. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 46(2). 141–151.
7.
Shura, Robert D., et al.. (2024). Evaluation of telehealth administration of MMPI symptom validity scales. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 46(2). 86–94. 3 indexed citations
9.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2023). Contrasting MMPI-3 validity scale effectiveness differences across in-person and telehealth administration procedures.. Psychological Assessment. 35(11). 925–937. 9 indexed citations
10.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2023). Evaluating Personality Assessment Inventory Response Patterns in Active-Duty Personnel With Head Injury Using a Latent Class Approach. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 38(5). 759–771. 1 indexed citations
11.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2021). The Influence of Service Era: Comparing Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Scale Scores Within a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Clinic (PCT). Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 29(3). 624–635. 2 indexed citations
12.
13.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2020). Evaluating the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting scales in a military neuropsychology clinic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 42(3). 263–273. 9 indexed citations
14.
Ingram, Paul B., Anthony M. Tarescavage, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, & Mary E. Oehlert. (2019). Patterns of MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scale scores observed across Veteran Affairs settings.. Psychological Services. 17(3). 355–362. 29 indexed citations
15.
Ingram, Paul B., Anthony M. Tarescavage, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, & Mary E. Oehlert. (2019). Comparing MMPI-2-Restructured Form Scores by Service Era for Veterans Assessed Within the Veteran Affairs Healthcare System. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 27(2). 366–375. 6 indexed citations
16.
Irvin, Dwight, et al.. (2017). Exploring paraprofessional and classroom factors affecting teacher supervision. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 73. 106–114. 6 indexed citations
17.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: a meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 30(4). 473–496. 45 indexed citations
18.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2016). Self-stigma, personality traits, and willingness to seek treatment in a community sample.. Psychological Services. 13(3). 300–307. 17 indexed citations
19.
Reynolds, Matthew R., et al.. (2013). Investigating the structure and invariance of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition in a sample of adults with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 34(10). 3235–3245. 20 indexed citations
20.
Ingram, Paul B., et al.. (2009). Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits. Brain and Cognition. 72(3). 355–361. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026