John Campbell

19.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
206 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

John Campbell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, John Campbell has authored 206 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 20 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in John Campbell's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (13 papers). John Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (13 papers). John Campbell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. John Campbell's co-authors include Angus Deaton, P. A. Yeats, Dubravka Ćećez-Kecmanović, Sebastian K. Boell, Kenneth S. Kendler, Wanli Ma, Carla Wilkin, Anita Greenhill, Stephen T. Moore and Gordon Fletcher and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Water Research and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

In The Last Decade

John Campbell

192 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Reference and Consciousness 1989 2026 2001 2013 2002 1989 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Campbell Australia 31 888 829 771 507 475 206 4.0k
Roger K. Blashfield United States 36 762 0.9× 375 0.5× 783 1.0× 1.2k 2.3× 467 1.0× 109 7.8k
J. E. McGuire United States 15 344 0.4× 281 0.3× 486 0.6× 983 1.9× 306 0.6× 40 5.2k
John Broome United Kingdom 23 191 0.2× 542 0.7× 818 1.1× 1.6k 3.1× 1.4k 3.0× 84 4.6k
Stephen Davies New Zealand 27 337 0.4× 596 0.7× 180 0.2× 188 0.4× 491 1.0× 191 2.7k
Shane Frederick United States 26 1.2k 1.3× 1.8k 2.2× 158 0.2× 1.9k 3.7× 4.1k 8.6× 49 11.7k
Fritjof Capra United States 22 183 0.2× 264 0.3× 220 0.3× 1.3k 2.6× 229 0.5× 65 5.7k
Marie Boas Hall United Kingdom 14 264 0.3× 270 0.3× 337 0.4× 1.0k 2.0× 348 0.7× 61 4.9k
Gilbert Ryle China 32 906 1.0× 867 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 633 1.2× 89 0.2× 129 5.8k
David Manley United Kingdom 35 626 0.7× 198 0.2× 499 0.6× 2.0k 4.0× 812 1.7× 162 4.9k
Karl Popper United Kingdom 21 227 0.3× 303 0.4× 424 0.5× 958 1.9× 328 0.7× 67 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Campbell. The network helps show where John Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Campbell. John Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haller, Armin, et al.. (2018). Knowledge pricing structures on MOOC platform – A use case analysis on edX. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 181. 6 indexed citations
2.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2016). Understanding the temporality of organizational motivation for crowdsourcing. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 7 indexed citations
3.
Kageleiry, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Out‐of‐pocket medical costs and third‐party healthcare costs for children with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 173(3). 627–637. 22 indexed citations
4.
Campbell, John & Quassim Cassam. (2014). Berkeley's puzzle. Oxford University Press eBooks. 15 indexed citations
5.
Campbell, John, Byron Keating, Carla Wilkin, & Stephen T. Moore. (2013). Multi-level IT project alignment in government services: Contracted employment services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
6.
Boell, Sebastian K., et al.. (2013). The Transformative Nature of Telework: A Review of the Literature. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 19 indexed citations
7.
Keating, Byron, et al.. (2013). Evaluating a New Pattern Development Process for Interface Design: Application to Mental Health Services. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1–10. 2 indexed citations
8.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2012). Crowdsourcing Motivations in a not-for-profit GLAM context: The Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–11. 20 indexed citations
9.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2012). Comparing Graphical and Tangible User Interfaces for a Tower Defense Game. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
10.
Houghton, Luke, et al.. (2011). ‘JUST A NOT-FOR-PROFIT’: SUPPORTING SUSTAINABILITY WITH BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE IN THE NOT-FOR-PROFIT SECTOR. University of Canberra Research Portal. 1–16. 2 indexed citations
11.
Wilkin, Carla & John Campbell. (2010). Corporate Governance of IT: A Case Study in An Australian Government Department. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 75. 8 indexed citations
12.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2010). User experience in HMI: an enhanced assessment model. University of Canberra Research Portal. 304–310. 3 indexed citations
13.
Campbell, John & Jon Heales. (2008). Factor Analysis of Individual Outcomes for Teleworkers. Protein Expression and Purification. 19(2). 176–185. 1 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2005). An Empirical Study of User Practice in Password Security and Management. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes. 26(1). 1–8. 3 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, John. (2004). Reference and Consciousness. The Philosophical Quarterly. 54(214). 2 indexed citations
16.
Mei, Jianping, Michael A. Moses, Michael J. Brennan, et al.. (2004). Vested Interest and Biased Price Estimates: Evidence from An Auction Market. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14 indexed citations
17.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2003). Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(1). 41–50. 25 indexed citations
18.
Greenhill, Anita, John Campbell, & Gordon Fletcher. (2002). Tribalism and Conflict: Conflict as a social unifier in a technologically enabled community. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 3 indexed citations
19.
Campbell, John & M. G. F. Martin. (1997). Sense, Reference and Selective Attention. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 71(71). 22 indexed citations
20.
Campbell, John & Thomas E. Flynn. (1990). Can Colleges Go back to a Core Curriculum. Planning for higher education. 19(1). 9–16. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026