John C. Griffith

467 total citations
30 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

John C. Griffith is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, John C. Griffith has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Education, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in John C. Griffith's work include Innovative Teaching Methods (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (9 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers). John C. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching Methods (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (9 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers). John C. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and China. John C. Griffith's co-authors include Emily Faulconer, Beverly Wood, Hermann Frank, Beatrice L. Wood, Steven D. Miller, John F. Weaver, Michael Atighetchi, David Levin, Derrick Kong and Brett Benyo and has published in prestigious journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Age and Ageing and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

John C. Griffith

25 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John C. Griffith United States 9 122 45 41 40 33 30 285
Lisa Davis United States 6 179 1.5× 46 1.0× 29 0.7× 27 0.7× 18 0.5× 13 326
Brooke Hollister United States 7 111 0.9× 82 1.8× 32 0.8× 30 0.8× 34 1.0× 15 272
Dale Musser United States 6 111 0.9× 35 0.8× 18 0.4× 48 1.2× 22 0.7× 19 285
Ben Van Dusen United States 9 183 1.5× 18 0.4× 37 0.9× 18 0.5× 16 0.5× 29 344
Sean Kearney Australia 10 276 2.3× 20 0.4× 88 2.1× 17 0.4× 23 0.7× 37 470
J. Wilde Ireland 5 154 1.3× 65 1.4× 29 0.7× 52 1.3× 16 0.5× 9 276
Gerda Reitsma South Africa 10 113 0.9× 51 1.1× 14 0.3× 26 0.7× 27 0.8× 24 250
Moses Kumi Asamoah Ghana 12 122 1.0× 24 0.5× 46 1.1× 38 0.9× 47 1.4× 56 381
Linda C. Hodges United States 12 220 1.8× 53 1.2× 16 0.4× 23 0.6× 11 0.3× 52 377
Penny Moore United States 7 91 0.7× 44 1.0× 38 0.9× 22 0.6× 88 2.7× 18 300

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Griffith. The network helps show where John C. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Griffith. John C. Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2024). A Tale 3 Airlines: Customer Service in Summer 2022. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 11(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Faulconer, Emily & John C. Griffith. (2021). Identifying Sources of Anxiety in an Introductory Online Undergraduate Chemistry Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 31(1). 143–151. 6 indexed citations
4.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2021). The impact of positive feedback on student outcomes and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(2). 259–268. 16 indexed citations
5.
Faulconer, Emily, Beverly Wood, & John C. Griffith. (2020). Infusing Humanities in STEM Education: Student Opinions of Disciplinary Connections in an Introductory Chemistry Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 29(3). 340–345. 11 indexed citations
6.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2020). Perspectives on Undergraduate Research Mentorship: A Comparative Analysis between Online and Traditional Faculty.. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 23(2). 1. 5 indexed citations
7.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2020). Surveying the Safety Culture of Academic Laboratories. Journal of College Science Teaching. 50(2). 18–26. 2 indexed citations
8.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2020). How we roll: A fire engine to every call? Fire department resource allocation and firefighter support in the United States. International Journal of Emergency Services. 9(3). 409–419. 2 indexed citations
9.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2019). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Grades and Learning Modes in an Introductory Research Methods Course. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 22(1). 1–18. 5 indexed citations
10.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2019). A Tale of Two Airlines: A Comparative Case Study of High-Road versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 5 indexed citations
11.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2018). A Comparison of Online, Video Synchronous, and Traditional Learning Modes for an Introductory Undergraduate Physics Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 27(5). 404–411. 38 indexed citations
12.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2018). If At First You Do Not Succeed: The Student Benefits of Multiple Trials on Summative Assessments. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University).
13.
Faulconer, Emily, et al.. (2017). A comparison of online and traditional chemistry lecture and lab. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 19(1). 392–397. 34 indexed citations
14.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2016). Bullying at the Fire Station? Perceptions Based on Gender, Race and Sexual Orientation. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 5(2). 34–44. 8 indexed citations
15.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2016). Faculty and Student Issues with Group Work: What is Problematic with College Group Assignments and Why?. Journal of Education and Human Development. 5(1). 19 indexed citations
16.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2016). A Replication of the 2008 U.S. National Report Card Study on Women in Firefighting. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 24(1). 13–18. 4 indexed citations
17.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2015). Does the Fire Station Have a Glass Ceiling? Perceptions of Female Firefighters. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 21(1). 26–32. 1 indexed citations
18.
Griffith, John C., et al.. (2014). Preferred Learning Mode, Instructor Competence and Tuition Reimbursement: What our Faculty and Students are Telling Us. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 1(4). 1 indexed citations
19.
Atighetchi, Michael, et al.. (2014). Federated Access to Cyber Observables for Detection of Targeted Attacks. 21. 60–66. 6 indexed citations
20.
Griffith, John C.. (2004). Family meetings--a qualitative exploration of improving care planning with older people and their families. Age and Ageing. 33(6). 577–581. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisa Davis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brooke Hollister Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dale Musser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ben Van Dusen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sean Kearney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Wilde Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerda Reitsma Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Moses Kumi Asamoah Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda C. Hodges Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Penny Moore
Rankless by CCL
2026