John A. Achter

765 citations
12 papers · 552 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Achter

12 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

John A. Achter
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 220
  • Social Psychology 278
  • Clinical Psychology 247
  • Safety Research 86
  • Applied Psychology 21
Replace Shannon Gadbois with:
Shannon Gadbois Canada
Eider Goñi Palacios Spain
Harald Valås Norway
William G. Masten United States
Jianhua Zhou China
Giselle B. Esquivel United States
Jennifer Riedl Cross United States
Shelby L. Levine Canada
Eleonora Ioana Pop Romania
Chuanhua Gu China
John A. Achter relative to Shannon Gadbois Canada Shannon Gadbois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Shannon Gadbois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Achter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Achter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Achter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Achter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Achter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Achter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Achter. The network helps show where John A. Achter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John A. Achter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Achter Line = papers co-authored together John A. Achter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1995232
2 199998
3 199688
4 200158
5 199740
6 199510
7
Correlates of Satisfaction, Intrapersonal Learning, and Academic Outcomes at Counseling Centers in a University System.
20168
8 20206
9
Blending Promise with Passion: Best Practices for Counseling Intellectually Talented Youth.
20056
10 19963
11 20012
12 19991

About John A. Achter

John A. Achter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (6 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (5 papers), Career Development and Diversity (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Mentoring and Academic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (220 citations), Social Psychology (278 citations), Clinical Psychology (247 citations), Safety Research (86 citations) and Applied Psychology (21 citations). John A. Achter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anita E. Kelly, David Lubinski, Camilla Persson Benbow, Jeffrey H. Kahn, Erin Winterrowd and Stacy J. Priniski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology, Gifted Child Quarterly, Journal of College Counseling and College student journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact