Nadia van der Spek
- Oncology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Irma M. Verdonck‐de LeeuwPim CuijpersWilliam BreitbartKaren HoltmaatJoël VosCornelia F. van Uden–KraanRob A.�E.�M. TollenaarBirgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte
- Topics
- Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEPsychological Medicine
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nadia van der Spek
15 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Oncology 143
- Clinical Psychology 122
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116
- Sociology and Political Science 88
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia van der Spek
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia van der Spek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia van der Spek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia van der Spek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia van der Spek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia van der Spek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia van der Spek. The network helps show where Nadia van der Spek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia van der Spek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia van der Spek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia van der Spek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia van der Spek. Nadia van der Spek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 93 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study | 12 |
| 17 | 51 |
About Nadia van der Spek
Nadia van der Spek is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Psychology and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (58 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (116 citations) and Clinical Psychology (122 citations). Nadia van der Spek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Pim Cuijpers, William Breitbart, Karen Holtmaat, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, Rob A.�E.�M. Tollenaar, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, C. René Leemans and Christi J. van Asperen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.