Nadia van der Spek

506 total citations
17 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Nadia van der Spek is a scholar working on Oncology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia van der Spek has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Nadia van der Spek's work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). Nadia van der Spek is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). Nadia van der Spek collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Nadia van der Spek's co-authors include Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Pim Cuijpers, William Breitbart, Karen Holtmaat, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, Joël Vos, Rob A.�E.�M. Tollenaar, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, C. René Leemans and Christi J. van Asperen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Nadia van der Spek

15 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nadia van der Spek Netherlands 9 143 122 116 88 85 17 318
Enric C. Sumalla Spain 7 139 1.0× 144 1.2× 153 1.3× 103 1.2× 48 0.6× 12 345
Lyndel Shand Australia 8 122 0.9× 160 1.3× 135 1.2× 79 0.9× 55 0.6× 11 351
Katharina Scheffold Germany 11 159 1.1× 85 0.7× 93 0.8× 78 0.9× 154 1.8× 15 309
Natalie Fenn United States 6 89 0.6× 121 1.0× 54 0.5× 49 0.6× 154 1.8× 13 326
Leon Sautier Germany 9 111 0.8× 134 1.1× 49 0.4× 96 1.1× 123 1.4× 12 420
Mohammadali Amini‐Tehrani Iran 10 89 0.6× 118 1.0× 40 0.3× 81 0.9× 41 0.5× 22 299
Alice Maruelli Italy 9 115 0.8× 117 1.0× 87 0.8× 25 0.3× 175 2.1× 20 322
Jon Tomas United Kingdom 4 112 0.8× 101 0.8× 90 0.8× 36 0.4× 222 2.6× 7 348
Celeste R. Phillips‐Salimi United States 9 49 0.3× 75 0.6× 240 2.1× 103 1.2× 127 1.5× 13 378
Astrid Przezdziecki Australia 5 195 1.4× 195 1.6× 40 0.3× 54 0.6× 44 0.5× 7 391

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia van der Spek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia van der Spek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia van der Spek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia van der Spek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia van der Spek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia van der Spek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia van der Spek. The network helps show where Nadia van der Spek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia van der Spek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia van der Spek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia van der Spek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia van der Spek. Nadia van der Spek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Spek, Nadia van der, et al.. (2025). Mental health symptom profiles and temporal trends in Dutch young people's social and emotional wellbeing and suicidality, 2017–2023. Journal of Affective Disorders. 390. 119844–119844.
2.
Spek, Nadia van der, et al.. (2025). Culture-sensitive lifestyle intervention tailored to non-Western migrant older adults improves physical performance: A randomized controlled trial. The journal of nutrition health & aging. 29(8). 100584–100584. 1 indexed citations
4.
Breedvelt, Josefien, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of attachment-based family therapy for suicidal adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(4). e13717–e13717. 3 indexed citations
5.
Morris, Linzette, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of family‐based therapy for depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Psychology. 58(6). 499–511. 4 indexed citations
6.
Spek, Nadia van der, et al.. (2023). Attachment-Based Family Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults With Suicide Ideation and Depression. Crisis. 45(1). 48–56. 3 indexed citations
7.
Holtmaat, Karen, Nadia van der Spek, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, et al.. (2019). Long‐term efficacy of meaning‐centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors: 2‐Year follow‐up results of a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology. 29(4). 711–718. 19 indexed citations
8.
Holtmaat, Karen, Nadia van der Spek, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, Pim Cuijpers, & Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw. (2018). Positive mental health among cancer survivors: overlap in psychological well-being, personal meaning, and posttraumatic growth. Supportive Care in Cancer. 27(2). 443–450. 15 indexed citations
9.
Spek, Nadia van der, Femke Jansen, Karen Holtmaat, et al.. (2018). Cost‐utility analysis of meaning‐centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 27(7). 1772–1779. 8 indexed citations
10.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine. 47(11). 1990–2001. 93 indexed citations
11.
Holtmaat, Karen, Nadia van der Spek, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, et al.. (2017). Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress. Supportive Care in Cancer. 25(11). 3385–3393. 12 indexed citations
12.
Spek, Nadia van der, et al.. (2017). Behandelprotocol zingevingsgerichte groepstherapie voor mensen met kanker. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks. 2 indexed citations
13.
Spek, Nadia van der & Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw. (2017). Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy for Cancer Survivors. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
14.
Holtmaat, Karen, Nadia van der Spek, Pim Cuijpers, C. René Leemans, & Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw. (2016). Posttraumatic growth among head and neck cancer survivors with psychological distress. Psycho-Oncology. 26(1). 96–101. 46 indexed citations
15.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2014). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 14(1). 22–22. 47 indexed citations
16.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2013). Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study. Psycho-Oncology. 22(9). 319–319. 12 indexed citations
17.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2013). Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e76089–e76089. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026