Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST FOR IDENTIFYING SEVERELY HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGH LEVELS OF AUTISTIC BEHAVIOR
1980697 citationsDavid Krug, Joel Arick et al.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Arick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Arick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Arick more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Arick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Arick. The network helps show where Joel Arick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joel Arick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joel Arick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joel Arick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joel Arick. Joel Arick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fullerton, Ann, et al.. (2003). Including youth with disabilities in outdoor programs: best practices, outcomes and resources..8 indexed citations
3.
Arick, Joel, et al.. (2002). Effective Practices and Participant Outcomes for Youth: Inclusive Camps and Outdoor Schools..1 indexed citations
4.
Fullerton, Ann, et al.. (2002). Qualitative Outcomes for Youth Who Participate in Inclusive Programs: A Multi-Case Analysis across 14 Camps and Outdoor Schools..4 indexed citations
5.
Arick, Joel, et al.. (2000). Inclusive Outdoor Programs Benefit Youth: Recent Research on Practices and Effects.. 73(4). 26–29.16 indexed citations
6.
Fullerton, Ann, et al.. (2000). The Impact of Camp Programs on Children with Disabilities: Opportunities for Independence..5 indexed citations
7.
Arick, Joel. (1997). A Full Evaluation Study of the Oregon Supported Education Plan and Its Impact upon Student Outcomes. Final Report..2 indexed citations
8.
Arick, Joel, et al.. (1996). A National Evaluation of Residential Camp Programs Serving Persons with Disabilities. Final Report..3 indexed citations
Arick, Joel. (1989). Prioritizing Inservice Needs for Educators of Students with Severe Handicaps in Heterogeneous Integrated Settings.. Education and training in mental retardation. 24(4).4 indexed citations
Krug, David, Joel Arick, & Patricia Almond. (1980). BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST FOR IDENTIFYING SEVERELY HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGH LEVELS OF AUTISTIC BEHAVIOR. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 21(3). 221–229.697 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Arick, Joel & David Krug. (1978). Autistic children: a study of learning characteristics and programming needs.. PubMed. 83(2). 200–2.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.