Joan Orme
- Public Administration top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John PowellVeronica CoulshedBeth R. CrispPam Green ListerChristine M. KoggelMartin StevensShereen HusseinJill Manthorpe
- Topics
- Social Work Education and Practice (35 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers)Research in Social Sciences (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joan Orme
48 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Public Administration 625
- General Health Professions 571
- Education 325
- Sociology and Political Science 182
- Clinical Psychology 134
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Orme
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Orme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Orme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Orme more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Orme
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Orme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Orme. The network helps show where Joan Orme may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Orme
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Orme. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Orme based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Orme. Joan Orme is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | A depth of data: research messages on the state of social work education in England | 10 |
| 4 | 60 | |
| 5 | Building Research Capacity in Social Work: Process and Issues | 8 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. Volume 1 : findings | 22 |
| 10 | Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. Volume 2 : technical appendix | 2 |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | Gender and Community Care: Social Work and Social Care Perspectives | 13 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | Social work practice: an introduction, 3rd edition | 12 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Care Management: Tasks and Workloads | 3 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Joan Orme
Joan Orme is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 48 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (35 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers) and Research in Social Sciences (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (625 citations), General Health Professions (571 citations) and Education (325 citations). Joan Orme has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Powell, Veronica Coulshed, Beth R. Crisp, Pam Green Lister, Christine M. Koggel, Martin Stevens, Shereen Hussein, Jill Manthorpe, Jo Moriarty and Katharine Briar‐Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Ageing and Society and The British Journal of Social Work.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.