Pam Green Lister

669 total citations
36 papers, 475 citations indexed

About

Pam Green Lister is a scholar working on Public Administration, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Pam Green Lister has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 475 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Public Administration, 18 papers in Education and 12 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Pam Green Lister's work include Social Work Education and Practice (23 papers), Research in Social Sciences (12 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (12 papers). Pam Green Lister is often cited by papers focused on Social Work Education and Practice (23 papers), Research in Social Sciences (12 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (12 papers). Pam Green Lister collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Pam Green Lister's co-authors include Beth R. Crisp, Joan Orme, Shereen Hussein, Gillian MacIntyre, Jill Manthorpe, Martin Stevens, Jo Moriarty, Mark R. Anderson, Kate Cavanagh and Eric Sharpe and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today and The British Journal of Social Work.

In The Last Decade

Pam Green Lister

35 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pam Green Lister United Kingdom	12	275	266	209	103	59	36	475
Mark Doel United Kingdom	12	331 1.2×	302 1.1×	181 0.9×	76 0.7×	80 1.4×	59	496
Ines Zuchowski Australia	14	305 1.1×	308 1.2×	129 0.6×	86 0.8×	63 1.1×	53	449
Pia Tham Sweden	11	347 1.3×	312 1.2×	129 0.6×	152 1.5×	67 1.1×	25	494
Pamela Trevithick United Kingdom	10	524 1.9×	428 1.6×	185 0.9×	246 2.4×	107 1.8×	15	711
Bradford W. Sheafor United States	7	211 0.8×	181 0.7×	98 0.5×	100 1.0×	66 1.1×	15	385
Jane Dalrymple United Kingdom	12	162 0.6×	214 0.8×	120 0.6×	109 1.1×	145 2.5×	22	413
Nina Maxwell United Kingdom	10	132 0.5×	158 0.6×	84 0.4×	168 1.6×	124 2.1×	39	395
Kimberly Strom‐Gottfried United States	12	240 0.9×	207 0.8×	74 0.4×	136 1.3×	88 1.5×	22	428
Joan Levy Zlotnik United States	12	353 1.3×	343 1.3×	64 0.3×	176 1.7×	107 1.8×	33	595
Sue Peckover United Kingdom	11	130 0.5×	215 0.8×	73 0.3×	194 1.9×	148 2.5×	24	484

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Green Lister

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Green Lister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Green Lister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Green Lister more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Green Lister

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Green Lister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Green Lister. The network helps show where Pam Green Lister may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Green Lister

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Green Lister. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Green Lister based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Green Lister. Pam Green Lister is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Lister, Pam Green. (2013). Integrating Social Work Theory and Practice. 2 indexed citations

Lister, Pam Green. (2012). Integrating Social Work Theory and Practice: A Practical Skills Guide. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

Moriarty, Jo, Jill Manthorpe, Martin Stevens, et al.. (2010). A depth of data: research messages on the state of social work education in England. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 10 indexed citations

Stalker, Kirsten, et al.. (2010). Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children and young people: A scoping study. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 15 indexed citations

Lister, Pam Green. (2010). Understanding and Using Theory in Social Work. Social Work Education. 29(3). 333–334. 7 indexed citations

Moriarty, Jo, Jill Manthorpe, Martin Stevens, et al.. (2009). A degree of success? Messages from the new social work degree in England for nurse education. Nurse Education Today. 30(5). 443–447. 5 indexed citations

Stalker, Kirsten, et al.. (2009). Disabled children and child protection. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).

Manthorpe, Jill, Jo Moriarty, Shereen Hussein, et al.. (2009). Applications to Social Work Programmes in England: Students as Consumers?. Social Work Education. 29(6). 584–598. 10 indexed citations

Orme, Joan, Gillian MacIntyre, Pam Green Lister, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. Volume 1 : findings. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 22 indexed citations

10.

Orme, Joan, Gillian MacIntyre, Pam Green Lister, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. Volume 2 : technical appendix. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2 indexed citations

11.

Orme, Joan, Gillian MacIntyre, Pam Green Lister, et al.. (2007). What (a) Difference a Degree Makes: The Evaluation of the New Social Work Degree in England. The British Journal of Social Work. 39(1). 161–178. 47 indexed citations

12.

Lister, Pam Green & Beth R. Crisp. (2007). Critical incident analyses: A practice learning tool for students and practitioners. Practice. 19(1). 47–60. 36 indexed citations

13.

Crisp, Beth R., Mark R. Anderson, Joan Orme, & Pam Green Lister. (2006). What Can We Learn about Social Work Assessment from the Textbooks?. Journal of Social Work. 6(3). 337–359. 11 indexed citations

14.

Crisp, Beth R., Mark R. Anderson, Joan Orme, & Pam Green Lister. (2006). Assessment Frameworks: A Critical Reflection. The British Journal of Social Work. 37(6). 1059–1077. 15 indexed citations

15.

Crisp, Beth R., et al.. (2006). Not Just Social Work Academics: The Involvement of Others in the Assessment of Social Work Students. Social Work Education. 25(7). 723–734. 32 indexed citations

16.

Crisp, Beth R. & Pam Green Lister. (2004). Child protection and public health: nurses’ responsibilities. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 47(6). 656–663. 40 indexed citations

17.

Crisp, Beth R., Ian Anderson, Joan Orme, & Pam Green Lister. (2003). Learning and teaching in social work education: assessment. Volume 1 of knowledge review. 30(7). 733–4. 9 indexed citations

18.

Lister, Pam Green. (2003). 'It's like you can't be a whole person, a mother who studies'. Lifelong learning: Mature women students with caring commitments in social work education. Social Work Education. 22(2). 125–138. 28 indexed citations

19.

Crisp, Beth R., Mark R. Anderson, Joan Orme, & Pam Green Lister. (2003). Learning and Teaching in Social Work Education: Assessment. 5 indexed citations

20.

Lister, Pam Green. (2003). Feminist Dilemmas in Data Analysis. Qualitative Social Work. 2(1). 45–59. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact