Jo Hilder

862 total citations
26 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Jo Hilder is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Hilder has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jo Hilder's work include Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers). Jo Hilder is often cited by papers focused on Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers). Jo Hilder collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Jo Hilder's co-authors include Ben Gray, Maria Stubbe, Anthony Dowell, Lindsay Macdonald, Meredith Marra, Ann Weatherall, Chris Lane, Bernadette Vine, Janet Holmes and Eileen McKinlay and has published in prestigious journals such as TESOL Quarterly, Medical Teacher and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Jo Hilder

25 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo Hilder New Zealand 10 213 88 85 63 53 26 353
Évelyne Bougie Canada 12 150 0.7× 62 0.7× 89 1.0× 19 0.3× 26 0.5× 24 363
Hans Harmsen Netherlands 8 222 1.0× 69 0.8× 119 1.4× 41 0.7× 14 0.3× 30 351
Chris R. Kasch United States 8 135 0.6× 60 0.7× 69 0.8× 17 0.3× 7 0.1× 10 323
Pernilla Pergert Sweden 16 479 2.2× 154 1.8× 138 1.6× 12 0.2× 36 0.7× 49 719
Hamideh Hakimi Iran 7 199 0.9× 255 2.9× 36 0.4× 11 0.2× 16 0.3× 26 489
Alicia A. Marshall United States 9 309 1.5× 32 0.4× 31 0.4× 9 0.1× 12 0.2× 10 491
Wafika A. Suliman Saudi Arabia 12 173 0.8× 157 1.8× 54 0.6× 21 0.3× 7 0.1× 14 592
Jennifer Peller Canada 8 163 0.8× 19 0.2× 61 0.7× 6 0.1× 11 0.2× 9 348
Rowena Viney United Kingdom 10 176 0.8× 35 0.4× 30 0.4× 7 0.1× 11 0.2× 21 359
Anna M. Houston United Kingdom 8 196 0.9× 47 0.5× 47 0.6× 5 0.1× 20 0.4× 11 303

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Hilder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Hilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Hilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Hilder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Hilder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Hilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Hilder. The network helps show where Jo Hilder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Hilder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Hilder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Hilder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Hilder. Jo Hilder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Garrett, Susan, et al.. (2024). Young People Talk About Digital Support for Mental Health: An Online Survey of 15–30‐Year Olds in New Zealand. Health Expectations. 27(4). e70001–e70001. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dowell, Anthony, Maria Stubbe, Susan Garrett, et al.. (2024). Evaluating Success and Challenges of a Primary Care Youth Mental Health Programme Using Complexity, Implementation Science, and Appreciative Inquiry. Cureus. 16(4). e58870–e58870. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gray, Ben & Jo Hilder. (2021). The ethics of interpreter use. Clinical Ethics. 16(4). 354–358. 2 indexed citations
4.
Thompson, Lee, et al.. (2021). How do patients and General Practitioners talk about pain and negotiate empathy in consultations? A direct observational study. Health & Social Care in the Community. 29(5). e153–e162. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gordon, Sarah, Tony Dowell, Susan Garrett, et al.. (2020). Reflections on allyship in the context of a co-produced evaluation of a youth-integrated therapies mental health intervention. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 18(4). 571–585. 5 indexed citations
6.
Hilder, Jo, Maria Stubbe, Lindsay Macdonald, Peter Abels, & Anthony Dowell. (2020). Communication in high risk ante-natal consultations: a direct observational study of interactions between patients and obstetricians. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1). 493–493. 7 indexed citations
8.
Hilder, Jo, Ben Gray, & Maria Stubbe. (2019). Integrating Health Navigation and Interpreting Services for Patients with Limited English Proficiency. 21(3). 116–127. 3 indexed citations
9.
Wenke, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Factors that influence the sustainability of structured allied health journal clubs: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 19(1). 6–6. 8 indexed citations
11.
Hilder, Jo, Ben Gray, & Maria Stubbe. (2019). Health navigation and interpreting services for patients with limited English proficiency: a narrative literature review. Journal of Primary Health Care. 11(3). 217–226. 12 indexed citations
12.
Gray, Ben, Maria Stubbe, & Jo Hilder. (2017). Integrating Health Navigation and Interpreting Services for Patients with Limited English Proficiency. Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago). 4 indexed citations
13.
Henning, Marcus A., Susan J. Hawken, Joanna MacDonald, et al.. (2017). Exploring educational interventions to facilitate health professional students’ professionally safe online presence. Medical Teacher. 39(9). 959–966. 16 indexed citations
14.
Hilder, Jo, et al.. (2016). ‘It depends on the consultation’: revisiting use of family members as interpreters for general practice consultations – when and why?. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 23(3). 257–262. 20 indexed citations
15.
Gray, Ben, et al.. (2016). Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent?. Research Ethics. 13(1). 23–41. 13 indexed citations
16.
McBain, Lynn, Sinéad Donnelly, Jo Hilder, Clare O’Leary, & Eileen McKinlay. (2015). “I wanted to communicate my feelings freely”: a descriptive study of creative responses to enhance reflection in palliative medicine education. BMC Medical Education. 15(1). 180–180. 20 indexed citations
17.
Stubbe, Maria, Chris Lane, Jo Hilder, et al.. (2013). Interakcja w miejscu pracy z perspektywy kilku podejść dyskursywnych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej. 9(1). 112–151. 2 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Ben, Jo Hilder, & Maria Stubbe. (2012). How to use interpreters in general practice: the development of a New Zealand toolkit. Journal of Primary Health Care. 4(1). 52–61. 43 indexed citations
19.
Gray, Ben, James Stanley, Maria Stubbe, & Jo Hilder. (2011). Communication difficulties with limited English proficiency patients: clinician perceptions of clinical risk and patterns of use of interpreters.. PubMed. 124(1342). 23–38. 16 indexed citations
20.
Gray, Ben, et al.. (2011). Why do we not use trained interpreters for all patients with limited English proficiency? Is there a place for using family members?. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 17(3). 240–249. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026