Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Holmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Holmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Holmes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Holmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Holmes. The network helps show where Janet Holmes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Holmes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Holmes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Holmes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Holmes. Janet Holmes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Angouri, Jo, Meredith Marra, & Janet Holmes. (2017). Negotiating Boundaries at Work. Edinburgh University Press eBooks.17 indexed citations
7.
Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra. (2015). Leadership and managing conflict in meetings. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 439–462.31 indexed citations
8.
Holmes, Janet & Kirk Hazen. (2014). Research methods in sociolinguistics: a practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell eBooks.48 indexed citations
9.
Ehrlich, Susan, Miriam Meyerhoff, & Janet Holmes. (2014). The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality. Wiley-Blackwell eBooks.14 indexed citations
Vine, Bernadette, et al.. (2009). Boundary-marking humor: institutional, gender and ethnic demarcation in the workplace. 182. 125–139.8 indexed citations
12.
Holmes, Janet. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics, 3rd edition. Longman eBooks.17 indexed citations
13.
Holmes, Janet. (2006). Gendered talk at work : constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Blackwell eBooks.82 indexed citations
14.
Holmes, Janet, et al.. (2003). The discourse of leadership. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 46. 31–46.6 indexed citations
15.
Marra, Meredith, et al.. (2001). Women's humour in the workplace: a quantitative analysis.. Australian journal of communication. 28(1). 83.30 indexed citations
16.
Holmes, Janet. (1999). Setting New Standards: Sound Changes and Gender in New Zealand English = Formando nuevos estándares: Cambios de pronunciación y género en el inglés de Nueva Zelanda. Hispana. 8(1). 147–175.1 indexed citations
17.
Holmes, Janet & Maria Stubbe. (1997). Good Listeners: Gender Differences in New Zealand Conversation. 20(2). 7.16 indexed citations
18.
MacIntosh, Jeffrey G., Janet Holmes, & Steven Thompson. (1991). The Puzzle of Shareholder Fiduciary Duties. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
19.
Bell, Allan & Janet Holmes. (1990). New Zealand ways of speaking English. Multilingual Matters eBooks.94 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.