Jessica Wang
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Education
- Co-authors
- G. Pascal ZacharyIan A. ApperlyLi Ching LeeMichelle TorokLauren McGillivraySteven FrissonSang‐Hun LeeSoo Yeun Lee
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEPhysics TodayCognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jessica Wang
19 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
- Clinical Psychology 96
- Social Psychology 49
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 42
- Education 40
Countries citing papers authored by Jessica Wang
This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica Wang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica Wang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica Wang. The network helps show where Jessica Wang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jessica Wang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jessica Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jessica Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jessica Wang. Jessica Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | Mindreading in Adults : Cognitive Basis, Motivation, and Individual Differences | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 54 | |
| 19 | Object-context affects 5-to-6-year-olds’ and adults’ ownership reasoning about artifacts and natural kinds | 0 |
| 20 | 85 |
About Jessica Wang
Jessica Wang is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations) and Clinical Psychology (96 citations). Jessica Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. Pascal Zachary, Ian A. Apperly, Li Ching Lee, Michelle Torok, Lauren McGillivray, Steven Frisson, Sang‐Hun Lee, Soo Yeun Lee, Dana Samson and Caren Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Physics Today and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.