Emily Bold
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 1
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Felicity Waite (7 shared papers)Chiara Causier (3 shared papers)Daniel Freeman (7 shared papers)Nicola Collett (6 shared papers)Eleanor Chadwick (6 shared papers)Rowan Diamond (6 shared papers)Jessica C. Bird (4 shared papers)Louise Isham (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BJPsych Open (2 papers)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)Comprehensive Psychiatry (1 paper)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Bold
8 papers receiving 420 citations
Emily Bold's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Health 164
- Sociology and Political Science 209
- Cognitive Neuroscience 80
- Modeling and Simulation 19
- Clinical Psychology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Bold
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Bold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Bold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Bold more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Bold
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Bold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Bold. The network helps show where Emily Bold may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emily Bold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 350 |
| 2 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 |
About Emily Bold
Emily Bold is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (164 citations), Sociology and Political Science (209 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (80 citations), Modeling and Simulation (19 citations) and Clinical Psychology (75 citations). Emily Bold has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Felicity Waite, Chiara Causier, Daniel Freeman, Nicola Collett, Eleanor Chadwick, Rowan Diamond, Jessica C. Bird, Louise Isham, Emma Černis and Kathryn M. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as BJPsych Open, Psychological Medicine, Comprehensive Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.