Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected
2020282 citationsJens Peter Andersen, Mathias Wullum Nielsen et al.eLifeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Peter Andersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Peter Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Peter Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Peter Andersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Peter Andersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Peter Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Peter Andersen. The network helps show where Jens Peter Andersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Peter Andersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Peter Andersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Peter Andersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Peter Andersen. Jens Peter Andersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andersen, Jens Peter, Mathias Wullum Nielsen, Nicole L. Simone, Resa E. Lewiss, & Reshma Jagsi. (2020). COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected. eLife. 9.282 indexed citations breakdown →
Andersen, Jens Peter & Mathias Wullum Nielsen. (2017). Do Google Scholar and Web of Science reflect women's and men's scholarly impact differently? A comparison of U.S. researchers in sociology and economics.. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 1156–1161.1 indexed citations
Andersen, Jens Peter, Fereshteh Didegah, & Jesper Wiborg Schneider. (2017). The necessity of comparing like with like in evaluative scientometrics: A first attempt to produce and test a generic approach to identifying relevant benchmark units.1 indexed citations
13.
Bloch, Carter Walter, et al.. (2016). Public-private collaboration and scientific impact: an analysis at the level of the individual researcher.1 indexed citations
Sørensen, Michael, et al.. (2015). National Klinisk Retningslinje for analkontinens hos voksne: Konservativ behandling og udredning af nyopstået fækalinkontinens efter fødsel.2 indexed citations
16.
Andersen, Jens Peter, et al.. (2013). Altmetrics: An Alternate Perspective on Research Evaluation. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 9(2).13 indexed citations
17.
Andersen, Jens Peter & Jesper Wiborg Schneider. (2011). Influence of study design on the citation patterns of Danish, medical research. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).2 indexed citations
Fedder, Jens, Gunnar Lauge Nielsen, Lars J. Petersen, et al.. (2011). A substantial number of scientific publications originate from non-university hospitals.. PubMed. 58(11). A4332–A4332.5 indexed citations
20.
Andersen, Jens Peter, Conni Skrubbeltrang, & Hans M. Gregersen. (2010). [Publication activity at Aalborg Hospital].. PubMed. 172(17). 1279–84.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.