Cindy Lopes‐Bento
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hanna HottenrottDirk CzarnitzkiAndrea Schenker‐WickiMathias BeckReinhilde VeugelersElena GolovkoWolfgang SofkaMarkus Simeth
- Topics
- Innovation Policy and R&D (24 papers)Firm Innovation and Growth (19 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cindy Lopes‐Bento
29 papers receiving 965 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Economics and Econometrics 793
- Strategy and Management 383
- Accounting 146
- Management of Technology and Innovation 144
- Political Science and International Relations 97
Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Lopes‐Bento
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Lopes‐Bento's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Lopes‐Bento with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Lopes‐Bento more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Lopes‐Bento
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Lopes‐Bento. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Lopes‐Bento. The network helps show where Cindy Lopes‐Bento may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Lopes‐Bento
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Lopes‐Bento. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Lopes‐Bento based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Lopes‐Bento. Cindy Lopes‐Bento is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 76 | |
| 6 | 152 | |
| 7 | 94 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 148 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Counterfactual impact evaluation of cohesion policy. Examples from support to innovation and research | 2 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Cindy Lopes‐Bento
Cindy Lopes‐Bento is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (24 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (19 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (793 citations), Strategy and Management (383 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (144 citations). Cindy Lopes‐Bento has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hanna Hottenrott, Dirk Czarnitzki, Andrea Schenker‐Wicki, Mathias Beck, Reinhilde Veugelers, Elena Golovko, Wolfgang Sofka, Markus Simeth, Cornelia Lawson and Philippe Vincent‐Lamarre. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Business Research and eLife.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.