Countries citing papers authored by Hans M. Gregersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans M. Gregersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans M. Gregersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans M. Gregersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans M. Gregersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans M. Gregersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans M. Gregersen. The network helps show where Hans M. Gregersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans M. Gregersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans M. Gregersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans M. Gregersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans M. Gregersen. Hans M. Gregersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Blaser, Jürgen & Hans M. Gregersen. (2013). Forests in the next 300 years.. 64(240). 61–73.2 indexed citations
3.
Blaser, Jürgen & Hans M. Gregersen. (2013). Los bosques en los próximos 300 años. 64(240). 61–73.1 indexed citations
4.
Andersen, Jens Peter, Conni Skrubbeltrang, & Hans M. Gregersen. (2010). [Publication activity at Aalborg Hospital].. PubMed. 172(17). 1279–84.1 indexed citations
5.
Contreras-Hermosilla, A., Hans M. Gregersen, & Adam White. (2008). Forest governance in countries with federal systems of government: lessons and implications for decentralization. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks.4 indexed citations
Gregersen, Hans M.. (1995). Valuing forests : context, issues, and guidelines. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations eBooks.11 indexed citations
10.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1995). Evaluación económica de las repercusiones de los proyectos forestales.
11.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1992). Priorities for forestry and agroforestry policy research : report of an international workshop.12 indexed citations
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1990). Planning and managing forestry research: Guidelines for managers.1 indexed citations
14.
Jakes, Pamela J., et al.. (1989). Research needs, assessment, and evaluation: identifying emerging issues as a key to forestry research planning.. 107–113.1 indexed citations
15.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1989). People and trees : the role of social forestry in sustainable development. World Bank eBooks. 1–290.65 indexed citations
16.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1987). Guidelines for economic appraisal of watershed management projects.. FAO eBooks.19 indexed citations
17.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1983). Forest-based development in Latin America : an analysis of investment opportunities and financing needs. Inter-American Development Bank eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1979). Economic analysis of forestry projects. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations eBooks.27 indexed citations
19.
Gregersen, Hans M., et al.. (1979). Economics of Public Forestry Incentive Programs: A Case Study of Cost-Sharing in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.