Jyoti Belur

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
44 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jyoti Belur is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jyoti Belur has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jyoti Belur's work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers). Jyoti Belur is often cited by papers focused on Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers). Jyoti Belur collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Jyoti Belur's co-authors include Lisa Tompson, Amy Thornton, Miranda Simon, Kate Bowers, Shane D. Johnson, Aiden Sidebottom, Hervé Borrion, Nick Tilley, Nayreen Daruwalla and Priti Parikh and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Cities and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

In The Last Decade

Jyoti Belur

43 papers receiving 969 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making

2018 423 citations Jyoti Belur, Lisa Tompson et al. Sociological Methods & Research profile →

Peers

Jyoti Belur

SPS

PSIR

CP

GHP

HEALT

Alexander L. Janus United Kingdom

Michael A. Dimock United States

Vincent Pons United States

Aaron Chalfin United States

Giampietro Gobo Italy

Ottar Hellevik Norway

Andrew Kohut United States

Tom Vander Beken Belgium

Vernon Gayle United Kingdom

Caroline Roberts Switzerland

Alexander L. Janus United Kingdom

Jyoti Belur

345 ×0.8

SPS

85 ×0.4

PSIR

97 ×0.7

CP

172 ×1.5

GHP

62 ×0.7

HEALT

Citations per year, relative to Jyoti Belur Jyoti Belur (= 1×) peers Alexander L. Janus

Countries citing papers authored by Jyoti Belur

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jyoti Belur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jyoti Belur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jyoti Belur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jyoti Belur

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jyoti Belur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jyoti Belur. The network helps show where Jyoti Belur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jyoti Belur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jyoti Belur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jyoti Belur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jyoti Belur. Jyoti Belur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Cockbain, Ella, et al.. (2025). Reframing Research Participation as Labour: Lessons From Sex Work Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 24.

2.

Belur, Jyoti, et al.. (2023). Reviewing the 3C’s of blended learning for police education: assessing capacity, building capability, and conquering challenges. Police Practice and Research. 25(2). 168–188. 3 indexed citations

3.

Tompson, Lisa, Jyoti Belur, Amy Thornton, et al.. (2020). How Strong is the Evidence-Base for Crime Reduction Professionals?. 4(1). 68–97. 10 indexed citations

4.

Tompson, Lisa, et al.. (2020). MASIP evaluation final report. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

5.

Parikh, Priti, et al.. (2020). Using heat maps to identify areas prone to violence against women in the public sphere. Crime Science. 9(1). 14 indexed citations

6.

Tompson, Lisa, et al.. (2019). Police Recruit Training Programmes: A Systematic Map of Research Literature. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 12 indexed citations

7.

Belur, Jyoti, et al.. (2019). A Systematic Review of Police Recruit Training Programmes. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 33 indexed citations

8.

Belur, Jyoti, Lisa Tompson, Amy Thornton, & Miranda Simon. (2018). Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making. Sociological Methods & Research. 50(2). 837–865. 423 indexed citations breakdown →

9.

Brown, Jennifer, Jyoti Belur, Lisa Tompson, et al.. (2018). Extending the remit of evidence-based policing. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 20(1). 38–51. 35 indexed citations

10.

Sidebottom, Aiden, Amy Thornton, Lisa Tompson, et al.. (2017). A systematic review of tagging as a method to reduce theft in retail environments. Crime Science. 6(1). 7–7. 17 indexed citations

11.

Tompson, Lisa & Jyoti Belur. (2015). Information retrieval in systematic reviews: a case study of the crime prevention literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 12(2). 187–207. 13 indexed citations

12.

Tilley, NJ, et al.. (2014). Protocol for Work Package 1: Identifying Existing Systematic Reviews of Crime Reduction. UCL Discovery (University College London). 4 indexed citations

13.

Belur, Jyoti, et al.. (2014). Police investigations: discretion denied yet undeniably exercised. Policing & Society. 25(5). 439–462. 11 indexed citations

14.

Belur, Jyoti, et al.. (2014). The social construction of ‘dowry deaths’. Social Science & Medicine. 119. 1–9. 18 indexed citations

15.

Belur, Jyoti. (2014). Permission to Shoot?: Police Use of Deadly Force in Democracies. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 16 indexed citations

16.

Belur, Jyoti. (2013). Education, Employment and Training. UCL Discovery (University College London). 10 indexed citations

17.

Sidebottom, Aiden, Jyoti Belur, Kate Bowers, Lisa Tompson, & Shane D. Johnson. (2011). Theft in Price-Volatile Markets: On the Relationship between Copper Price and Copper Theft. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 48(3). 396–418. 39 indexed citations

18.

Belur, Jyoti. (2011). Police stop and search in India: Mumbainakabandi. Policing & Society. 21(4). 420–431. 5 indexed citations

19.

Belur, Jyoti. (2010). Police Use of Deadly Force: Police Perceptions of a Culture of Approval. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

20.

Belur, Jyoti. (2008). Is policing domestic violence institutionally racist? A case study of south Asian Women. Policing & Society. 18(4). 426–444. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact