Jens Laage‐Hellman

958 total citations
32 papers, 579 citations indexed

About

Jens Laage‐Hellman is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Laage‐Hellman has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 579 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Strategy and Management, 9 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jens Laage‐Hellman's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (15 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers). Jens Laage‐Hellman is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (15 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers). Jens Laage‐Hellman collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Italy and Türkiye. Jens Laage‐Hellman's co-authors include Frida Lind, Andréa Perna, Annika Rickne, Ulf Nilsson, Björn Axelsson, Maureen McKelvey, Kristina Håkansson, Lars‐Erik Gadde, Tommy Shih and Christina Öberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, Industrial Marketing Management and Small Business Economics.

In The Last Decade

Jens Laage‐Hellman

29 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jens Laage‐Hellman Sweden 14 332 174 106 100 72 32 579
Hélène Delerue Canada 13 248 0.7× 96 0.6× 64 0.6× 79 0.8× 53 0.7× 29 456
Ann E. Echols United States 7 437 1.3× 239 1.4× 175 1.7× 47 0.5× 88 1.2× 13 669
D. Robley Wood United States 6 448 1.3× 357 2.1× 211 2.0× 104 1.0× 142 2.0× 11 753
Akiya Nagata Japan 4 426 1.3× 371 2.1× 379 3.6× 48 0.5× 96 1.3× 10 772
José Luis Méndez Spain 9 490 1.5× 206 1.2× 154 1.5× 48 0.5× 70 1.0× 16 782
Virginia Acha United Kingdom 11 281 0.8× 108 0.6× 194 1.8× 36 0.4× 33 0.5× 24 549
Liselore Berghman Netherlands 8 359 1.1× 120 0.7× 47 0.4× 105 1.1× 35 0.5× 19 568
Alberto Cavaliere Italy 6 280 0.8× 131 0.8× 151 1.4× 25 0.3× 42 0.6× 18 464
María Teresa Bolívar–Ramos Spain 10 296 0.9× 176 1.0× 123 1.2× 49 0.5× 36 0.5× 13 525
Thomas Klueter Spain 10 257 0.8× 127 0.7× 148 1.4× 30 0.3× 67 0.9× 25 404

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Laage‐Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Laage‐Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Laage‐Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Laage‐Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Laage‐Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Laage‐Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Laage‐Hellman. The network helps show where Jens Laage‐Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Laage‐Hellman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Laage‐Hellman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Laage‐Hellman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Laage‐Hellman. Jens Laage‐Hellman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, Frida Lind, & Andréa Perna. (2021). The role of openness in collaborative innovation in industrial networks: historical and contemporary cases. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 36(13). 116–128. 16 indexed citations
2.
Kurdve, Martin, Anna Bird, & Jens Laage‐Hellman. (2020). Establishing SME–university collaboration through innovation support programmes. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 31(8). 1583–1604. 18 indexed citations
3.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, Frida Lind, Christina Öberg, & Tommy Shih. (2017). Never look back?: Modes of interaction between university spin-offs and the academia following commercialization. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
4.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens & Maureen McKelvey. (2015). How Networks and Sectoral Conditions Affect Commercialization in a Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurial Venture in the Medical Technology Industry: A case study of Aerocrine. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
5.
Aaboen, Lise, Jens Laage‐Hellman, Frida Lind, Christina Öberg, & Tommy Shih. (2014). University spin-offs and their roles in business networks. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
6.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, et al.. (2012). Regional strength in global competition: Collaborative patterns for life science firms in Western Sweden. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
7.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, et al.. (2012). Building regional strength in global competition - Collaborative patterns for life-science firms in Western Sweden. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
8.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, et al.. (2011). Biomedical areas of strength in Western Sweden. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).
9.
Zika, Eleni, et al.. (2010). A European Survey on Biobanks: Trends and Issues. Public Health Genomics. 14(2). 96–103. 51 indexed citations
10.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens, Maureen McKelvey, & Mattias Johansson. (2009). Analysis of Chain-linked Effects of Public Policy: Effects on Research and Industry in Swedish Life sciences for Innovative Food and Medical Technology. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 4 indexed citations
11.
Rickne, Annika, et al.. (2004). The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 13 indexed citations
12.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens. (2003). Clinical Genomics Companies and Biobanks: the use of biosamples in commercial research on the genetics of common diseases. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
13.
Çetindamar, Dilek & Jens Laage‐Hellman. (2003). Growth Dynamics in the Biomedical/Biotechnology System. Small Business Economics. 20(4). 287–303. 19 indexed citations
14.
Axelsson, Björn, Jens Laage‐Hellman, & Ulf Nilsson. (2002). Modern management accounting for modern purchasing. 8(1). 53–62. 57 indexed citations
15.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens. (2002). Business Networks in Japan. 12 indexed citations
16.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens. (1998). Den biomedicinska industrin i Sverige. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
17.
Dubois, Anna, et al.. (1998). Adjustments and Division of Labour in the Construction Industry. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).
18.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens & Lars‐Erik Gadde. (1996). Information Technology and the Efficiency of Materials Supply - The implementation of EDI in the construction industry. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 4 indexed citations
19.
Laage‐Hellman, Jens & Lars‐Erik Gadde. (1996). Information technology and the efficiency of materials supply. 2(4). 221–228. 24 indexed citations
20.
Håkansson, Håkan, et al.. (1993). Teknikutveckling i företaget. Ett nätverksperspektiv. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026