Jens Kondrup

16.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
88 papers, 11.7k citations indexed

About

Jens Kondrup is a scholar working on Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Kondrup has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 11.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Physiology, 43 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 18 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Jens Kondrup's work include Nutrition and Health in Aging (43 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (39 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (18 papers). Jens Kondrup is often cited by papers focused on Nutrition and Health in Aging (43 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (39 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (18 papers). Jens Kondrup collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and China. Jens Kondrup's co-authors include Peter Ott, Jens Otto Clemmesen, Fin Stolze Larsen, Manfred J. Müller, Mathias Plauth, Rémy Meier, Bent Adel Hansen, Matthias Pirlich, Niels Grunnet and Janice Sorensen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Jens Kondrup

88 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Hit Papers

ESPEN Guidelines for Nutrition Screening 2002 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 2003 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jens Kondrup Denmark 45 8.0k 4.8k 3.1k 2.2k 1.6k 88 11.7k
Matthias Pirlich Germany 41 6.8k 0.8× 2.6k 0.5× 1.7k 0.6× 1.7k 0.8× 665 0.4× 89 9.0k
Arved Weimann Germany 40 4.3k 0.5× 2.3k 0.5× 4.8k 1.6× 856 0.4× 1.3k 0.8× 172 9.3k
Carla M. Prado Canada 63 14.3k 1.8× 2.3k 0.5× 3.1k 1.0× 4.5k 2.0× 1.0k 0.6× 300 18.4k
Ingvar Bosæus Sweden 56 10.6k 1.3× 2.7k 0.6× 3.0k 1.0× 2.4k 1.1× 143 0.1× 189 16.1k
Kenneth C. H. Fearon United Kingdom 57 7.5k 0.9× 1.5k 0.3× 8.2k 2.7× 1.5k 0.7× 238 0.1× 113 16.4k
M.A.E. de van der Schueren Netherlands 56 9.4k 1.2× 3.7k 0.8× 2.4k 0.8× 3.5k 1.6× 89 0.1× 202 12.2k
Maurizio Muscaritoli Italy 33 7.4k 0.9× 2.3k 0.5× 1.8k 0.6× 2.0k 0.9× 99 0.1× 105 10.4k
Wolfram Doehner Germany 68 6.4k 0.8× 580 0.1× 2.2k 0.7× 2.9k 1.3× 196 0.1× 296 18.7k
Gaetano Crepaldi Italy 58 2.7k 0.3× 580 0.1× 2.0k 0.7× 1.2k 0.5× 173 0.1× 373 11.7k
Gordon L. Jensen United States 46 4.9k 0.6× 3.1k 0.6× 1.5k 0.5× 1.0k 0.5× 52 0.0× 147 8.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Kondrup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Kondrup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Kondrup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Kondrup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Kondrup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Kondrup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Kondrup. The network helps show where Jens Kondrup may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Kondrup

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Kondrup. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Kondrup based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Kondrup. Jens Kondrup is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kondrup, Jens. (2018). Nutrition risk screening in the ICU. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 22(2). 159–161. 10 indexed citations
2.
Friedli, Natalie, Zeno Stanga, Alison Culkin, et al.. (2017). Management and prevention of refeeding syndrome in medical inpatients: An evidence-based and consensus-supported algorithm. Nutrition. 47. 13–20. 98 indexed citations
3.
Kondrup, Jens. (2014). Nutritional-risk scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 17(2). 177–182. 68 indexed citations
4.
Singer, Pierre, M. Hiesmayr, Gianni Biolo, et al.. (2013). Pragmatic approach to nutrition in the ICU: Expert opinion regarding which calorie protein target. Clinical Nutrition. 33(2). 246–251. 74 indexed citations
5.
Zellner, Maria, Rita Babeluk, Christopher Gerner, et al.. (2011). A proteomics study reveals a predominant change in MaoB expression in platelets of healthy volunteers after high protein meat diet: relationship to the methylation cycle. Journal of Neural Transmission. 118(5). 653–662. 14 indexed citations
6.
Schindler, Karin, Elisabeth Pernicka, Alessandro Laviano, et al.. (2010). How nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals: A survey of 21,007 patients findings from the 2007–2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey. Clinical Nutrition. 29(5). 552–559. 201 indexed citations
8.
Liang, Xiaokun, et al.. (2009). Nutritional risk, malnutrition (undernutrition), overweight, obesity and nutrition support among hospitalized patients in Beijing teaching hospitals.. PubMed. 18(1). 54–62. 40 indexed citations
9.
Sorensen, Janice, Jens Kondrup, Jacek Prokopowicz, et al.. (2008). EuroOOPS: An international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clinical Nutrition. 27(3). 340–349. 425 indexed citations
10.
Lindorff‐Larsen, Karen, Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen, Jens Kondrup, Michael Staun, & Karin Ladefoged. (2007). Management and perception of hospital undernutrition—A positive change among Danish doctors and nurses. Clinical Nutrition. 26(3). 371–378. 80 indexed citations
11.
Rasmussen, Henrik Højgaard, Jens Kondrup, Michael Staun, et al.. (2006). A method for implementation of nutritional therapy in hospitals. Clinical Nutrition. 25(3). 515–523. 78 indexed citations
12.
Plauth, Mathias, Eduard Cabré, Oliviero Riggio, et al.. (2006). ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Liver disease. Clinical Nutrition. 25(2). 285–294. 462 indexed citations
13.
Johansen, Niels Bent, et al.. (2003). Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk. Clinical Nutrition. 23(4). 539–550. 160 indexed citations
14.
Kondrup, Jens. (2001). Can food intake in hospitals be improved?. Clinical Nutrition. 20. 153–160. 59 indexed citations
15.
Clemmesen, Jens Otto, Fin Stolze Larsen, Jens Kondrup, Bent Adel Hansen, & Peter Ott. (1999). Cerebral Herniation in Patients With Acute E Liver Failure Is Correlated With Arterial Ammonia Concentration. Hepatology. 29(3). 648–653. 467 indexed citations
16.
Rasmussen, H, Jens Kondrup, K. Ladefoged, & Michael Staun. (1999). Clinical nutrition in Danish hospitals: a questionnaire-basednutrition among doctors and nurses. Clinical Nutrition. 18(3). 153–158. 85 indexed citations
17.
Kondrup, Jens. (1998). Outcome From Nutritional Support Using Hospital Food. Nutrition. 14(3). 319–321. 39 indexed citations
18.
Plauth, Mathias, Manuela Merli, Jens Kondrup, et al.. (1997). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition in liver disease and transplantation. Clinical Nutrition. 16(2). 43–55. 297 indexed citations
19.
Jacobsen, E., et al.. (1995). Hypogkycaemia in spinal muscular atrophy. The Lancet. 346(8975). 609–610. 32 indexed citations
20.
Kondrup, Jens, Frank Lundquist, & S. Damgaard. (1979). Metabolism of palmitate in perfused rat liver. Effect of low and high ethanol concentrations at various concentrations of palmitate in the perfusion medium. Biochemical Journal. 184(1). 83–88. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026