Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

596 citations
24 papers · 328 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers)Digital and Cyber Forensics (5 papers)Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (5 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSociologySociology of Health & Illness

In The Last Decade

Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

23 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Dana Wilson‐Kovacs
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Sociology and Political Science 102
  • Information Systems 62
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 60
  • Gender Studies 55
  • Safety Research 42
Replace Irma van der Ploeg with:
Irma van der Ploeg Netherlands
Eva Lievens Belgium
Jörgen S. Svensson Netherlands
Kelly Gates United States
Mary Ellen O’Connell United States
Andrew Hope United Kingdom
Amanda Menking United States
Keith Gilbert Australia
Rachel Adams South Africa
Fredrik Stiernstedt Sweden
Dana Wilson‐Kovacs relative to Irma van der Ploeg Netherlands Irma van der Ploeg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Irma van der Ploeg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Wilson‐Kovacs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Wilson‐Kovacs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Wilson‐Kovacs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Wilson‐Kovacs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Wilson‐Kovacs. The network helps show where Dana Wilson‐Kovacs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Wilson‐Kovacs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Wilson‐Kovacs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Wilson‐Kovacs. Dana Wilson‐Kovacs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 5
3 7
4 2
5 6
6 22
7 2
8 7
9 19
10 2
11 22
12 36
13
British Sociological Association Annual Conference
9
14 15
15 0
16 1
17 68
18 36
19 24
20 1

About Dana Wilson‐Kovacs

Dana Wilson‐Kovacs is a scholar working on Public Administration, Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (5 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (55 citations), Safety Research (42 citations) and Information Systems (62 citations). Dana Wilson‐Kovacs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christine Hauskeller, Michelle K. Ryan, S. Alexander Haslam, Anna Rabinovich, David Wyatt, Brian Rappert, Hannah Wheat, Susanne Weber, Sabina Leonelli and Bethany Growns. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sociology and Sociology of Health & Illness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026