Lies Notebaert

2.1k total citations
79 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Lies Notebaert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lies Notebaert has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 27 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lies Notebaert's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (47 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers). Lies Notebaert is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (47 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers). Lies Notebaert collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Lies Notebaert's co-authors include Colin MacLeod, Patrick Clarke, Ben Grafton, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, Jan Theeuwes, Geoff Hammond, Jan De Houwer, Michael Browning and Robert J. Hartsuiker and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Lies Notebaert

71 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lies Notebaert Australia 21 890 768 452 144 132 79 1.4k
Patrick Clarke Australia 22 1.2k 1.4× 803 1.0× 756 1.7× 184 1.3× 157 1.2× 81 1.8k
Igor Marchetti Italy 19 1.1k 1.2× 881 1.1× 624 1.4× 132 0.9× 185 1.4× 45 1.7k
Álvaro Sánchez-López Spain 22 941 1.1× 552 0.7× 550 1.2× 140 1.0× 175 1.3× 78 1.5k
Richard B. Lopez United States 16 840 0.9× 925 1.2× 666 1.5× 63 0.4× 208 1.6× 37 1.9k
Evi De Lissnyder Belgium 11 1.2k 1.3× 641 0.8× 648 1.4× 42 0.3× 112 0.8× 12 1.6k
Katherine Vytal United States 14 849 1.0× 1.2k 1.5× 306 0.7× 60 0.4× 154 1.2× 14 1.9k
Carmen Morawetz Germany 21 624 0.7× 919 1.2× 351 0.8× 73 0.5× 253 1.9× 51 1.7k
Julia Klawohn Germany 24 889 1.0× 1.2k 1.5× 686 1.5× 41 0.3× 224 1.7× 57 1.7k
Miranda Beltzer United States 15 487 0.5× 694 0.9× 225 0.5× 52 0.4× 107 0.8× 33 1.2k
Jan Richter Germany 18 602 0.7× 418 0.5× 378 0.8× 56 0.4× 151 1.1× 44 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Lies Notebaert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lies Notebaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lies Notebaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lies Notebaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lies Notebaert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lies Notebaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lies Notebaert. The network helps show where Lies Notebaert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lies Notebaert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lies Notebaert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lies Notebaert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lies Notebaert. Lies Notebaert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clarke, Patrick, et al.. (2025). Psychological distress and negative life events among university students: mapping patterns of exposure and impact. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 39(2). 205–219.
3.
MacLeod, Colin M., et al.. (2025). The Role of Emotion Regulation in Distinct Measures of Emotional Resilience. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 49(4). 748–768.
4.
Notebaert, Lies, et al.. (2025). Resilience to Workplace Incivility: How Different Recovery Experiences Influence Resilience Dimensions. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 6(4). 431–445.
5.
Notebaert, Lies, Patrick Clarke, Frances Meeten, Jemma Todd, & Bram Van Bockstaele. (2024). Cognitive flexibility and resilience measured through a residual approach. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 38(1). 125–139. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bockstaele, Bram Van, Patrick Clarke, Jemma Todd, et al.. (2024). Effects of intensity on emotion regulation strategy preferences are emotion-specific. Motivation and Emotion. 48(6). 903–915.
7.
Ji, Julie L., Marcella L. Woud, Lies Notebaert, et al.. (2024). Investigating the role of mental imagery use in the assessment of anhedonia. Cognition & Emotion. 39(2). 227–245. 1 indexed citations
8.
Notebaert, Lies, et al.. (2024). Occurrence of potentially traumatic events, type, and severity in undergraduate students. Australian Psychologist. 60(1). 43–53. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bockstaele, Bram Van, et al.. (2023). No trait anxiety linked differences in affective and non-affective task-switching. Personality and Individual Differences. 217. 112438–112438.
10.
Notebaert, Lies, et al.. (2023). Cognitive Biases and Insomnia Symptoms in People With and Without Chronic Pain. Journal of Pain. 25(6). 104449–104449. 2 indexed citations
11.
Todd, Jemma, et al.. (2022). Chronic Pain, Insomnia and their Mutual Maintenance: A Call for Cognitive Bias Research. Journal of Pain. 23(9). 1530–1542. 12 indexed citations
12.
Basanovic, Julian, Jemma Todd, Bram Van Bockstaele, et al.. (2022). Assessing anxiety-linked impairment in attentional control without eye-tracking: The masked-target antisaccade task. Behavior Research Methods. 55(1). 135–142. 5 indexed citations
14.
Timming, Andrew R., et al.. (2021). Western Australia's Local Government Act 25 years on and under review: A qualitative study of local government Chief Executive Officers. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 80(4). 809–829. 1 indexed citations
15.
Todd, Jemma, Colin MacLeod, & Lies Notebaert. (2021). Attentional processes and contamination-related intrusion distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 140. 103833–103833. 3 indexed citations
16.
Bockstaele, Bram Van, Patrick Clarke, Lies Notebaert, Colin MacLeod, & Elske Salemink. (2020). Effects of cognitive load during interpretation bias modification on interpretation bias and stress reactivity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 68. 101561–101561. 12 indexed citations
17.
Szentágotai‐Tătar, Aurora, et al.. (2017). Prediction of pre-exam state anxiety from ruminative disposition: The mediating role of impaired attentional disengagement from negative information. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 91. 102–110. 11 indexed citations
18.
Grafton, Ben, Colin MacLeod, Daniel Rudaizky, et al.. (2017). Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 211(5). 266–271. 91 indexed citations
19.
Vervoort, Tine, Line Caes, Zina Trost, Lies Notebaert, & Liesbet Goubert. (2012). Parental attention to their child's pain is modulated by threat-value of pain.. Health Psychology. 31(5). 623–631. 26 indexed citations
20.
Notebaert, Lies, Geert Crombez, Julia Vogt, et al.. (2011). Attempts to control pain prioritize attention towards signals of pain: An experimental study. Pain. 152(5). 1068–1073. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026