Jean A. Carter
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- General Psychology top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Charles J. GelsoClara E. HillJosephine D. JohnsonMiguel GallardoThomas A. ParhamLinda BrooksCharles D. ClaibornP. Paul Heppner
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers)Counseling Practices and Supervision (7 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Counseling PsychologyJournal of Clinical PsychologyProfessional Psychology Research and Practice
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jean A. Carter
17 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Clinical Psychology 764
- Social Psychology 589
- General Psychology 96
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 73
- Applied Psychology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Jean A. Carter
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean A. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean A. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean A. Carter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean A. Carter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean A. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean A. Carter. The network helps show where Jean A. Carter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean A. Carter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean A. Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean A. Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean A. Carter. Jean A. Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 307 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 365 | |
| 14 | 127 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 36 |
About Jean A. Carter
Jean A. Carter is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (7 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (764 citations) and Social Psychology (589 citations). Jean A. Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles J. Gelso, Clara E. Hill, Josephine D. Johnson, Miguel Gallardo, Thomas A. Parham, Linda Brooks, Charles D. Claiborn, P. Paul Heppner, John P. Galassi and Elizabeth L. Holloway. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.