Jay D. Currie

434 citations
12 papers · 332 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jay D. Currie

12 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Jay D. Currie
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 190
  • Family Practice 48
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 24
  • Health 39
  • Pharmacology 40
Replace Mary F. Powers with:
Mary F. Powers United States
Autumn Stewart‐Lynch United States
Abilio C. de Almeida Neto Australia
Andrea Hilton United Kingdom
Marcia M. Worley United States
Eman Elayeh Jordan
Kebede Beyene New Zealand
Jennifer L. Bacci United States
Ali Elbeddini United States
Sarah E. Kelling United States
Jay D. Currie relative to Mary F. Powers United States Mary F. Powers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mary F. Powers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay D. Currie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay D. Currie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay D. Currie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay D. Currie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay D. Currie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay D. Currie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay D. Currie. The network helps show where Jay D. Currie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jay D. Currie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay D. Currie Line = papers co-authored together Jay D. Currie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199759
2 199856
3 201455
4 199754
5 200627
6 200326
7 201521
8 199918
9 20059
10
Iowa Priority's Brown Bag Medication Reviews: A Comparison of Pharmacy Students and Pharmacists
20114
11 19982
12 20071

About Jay D. Currie

Jay D. Currie is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper) and Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (190 citations), Family Practice (48 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (24 citations), Health (39 citations) and Pharmacology (40 citations). Jay D. Currie has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Chrischilles, Michael E. Ernst, Bernard A. Sorofman, John Rovers, William R. Doucette, Karen B. Farris, Patty Kumbera, Jens Kühle, Anandi V. Law and Stephanie J. Phelps. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact