Jay C. Wade

1.2k citations
34 papers · 805 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jay C. Wade

34 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

Jay C. Wade
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Gender Studies 423
  • General Psychology 24
  • Social Psychology 234
  • Sociology and Political Science 383
  • Clinical Psychology 162
Replace Leah R. Warner with:
Leah R. Warner United States
Matt Englar‐Carlson United States
Bryana H. French United States
José Maria de Castro Abreu United States
Beverly J. Vandiver United States
Richard Majors United States
Cheryl de la Rey South Africa
Christopher T. H. Liang United States
Margie J. Geasler United States
Nayeli Y. Chavez‐Dueñas United States
Jay C. Wade relative to Leah R. Warner United States Leah R. Warner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Leah R. Warner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay C. Wade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay C. Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay C. Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay C. Wade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay C. Wade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay C. Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay C. Wade. The network helps show where Jay C. Wade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jay C. Wade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay C. Wade Line = papers co-authored together Jay C. Wade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200180
2 199862
3 200761
4 200954
5 200854
6 201251
7 199650
8 199443
9 200840
10 200739
11 199831
12 199829
13 199328
14 201023
15 200020
16 201217
17 200216
18 200114
19 201911
20 200711

About Jay C. Wade

Jay C. Wade is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (22 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (8 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (423 citations), General Psychology (24 citations), Social Psychology (234 citations), Sociology and Political Science (383 citations) and Clinical Psychology (162 citations). Jay C. Wade has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deidre M. Anglin, Aaron B. Rochlen, Charles J. Gelso, Patrick A. Coughlin, Mary Ann Hoffman, Margaret R. Rogers, Glenn E. Good, Anthony Isacco, Charles Lewis and Cokorda Bagus Jaya Lesmana. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Men & Masculinity, Sex Roles, The Counseling Psychologist, The Journal of Men s Studies and Evaluation and Program Planning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact