Jasper Hopkins
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Classics top 10%
- History top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Desmond Paul HenryNicholas
- Topics
- Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jasper Hopkins
15 papers receiving 72 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Philosophy 54
- Sociology and Political Science 26
- Classics 21
- History 21
- Political Science and International Relations 16
Countries citing papers authored by Jasper Hopkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Jasper Hopkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jasper Hopkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jasper Hopkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jasper Hopkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jasper Hopkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jasper Hopkins. The network helps show where Jasper Hopkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jasper Hopkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jasper Hopkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jasper Hopkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jasper Hopkins. Jasper Hopkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM IN NICHOLAS OF CUSA’S SERMONS | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | A miscellany on Nicholas of Cusa | 2 |
| 6 | Nicholas of Cusa's De pace fidei and Cribratio Alkorani : translation and analysis | 3 |
| 7 | A new, interpretive translation of St. Anselm's Monologion and Proslogion | 8 |
| 8 | Nicholas of Cusa's Dialectical Mysticism: Text, Translation, and Interpretive Study of De Visione Dei | 10 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Nicholas of Cusa's Metaphysic of Contraction | 1 |
| 11 | Nicholas of Cusa On learned ignorance: A translation and an appraisal of De docta ignorantia | 17 |
| 12 | Nicholas of Cusa's debate with John Wenck: A translation and an appraisal of De ignota litteratura and Apologia doctae ignorantiae | 2 |
| 13 | Nicholas of Cusa on God as not-other: A translation and an appraisal of De li non aliud | 2 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | A concise introduction to the philosophy of Nicholas of Cusa | 14 |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About Jasper Hopkins
Jasper Hopkins is a scholar working on Classics, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (21 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Jasper Hopkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Desmond Paul Henry and Nicholas. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Sixteenth Century Journal and Midwest Studies in Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.