Mavis Machirori

562 total citations
10 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Mavis Machirori is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Mavis Machirori has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Mavis Machirori's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Mavis Machirori is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Mavis Machirori collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Mavis Machirori's co-authors include Susan Kelly, Edward S. Dove, Federica Lucivero, Sandi Dheensa, Barbara Prainsack, Christina Raker, Christine Patch, Peter Dixon, Nicole M.King and Jenny Chambers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Nature Reviews Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Mavis Machirori

10 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mavis Machirori United Kingdom 6 136 78 69 67 64 10 312
Vidya Seshan Oman 10 48 0.4× 51 0.7× 36 0.5× 78 1.2× 41 0.6× 40 310
Heather Pauls United States 14 52 0.4× 140 1.8× 19 0.3× 86 1.3× 45 0.7× 23 458
Harry Campbell United Kingdom 11 51 0.4× 57 0.7× 57 0.8× 42 0.6× 44 0.7× 18 509
A. Robertson United Kingdom 9 68 0.5× 147 1.9× 29 0.4× 59 0.9× 42 0.7× 12 392
Mary Anne Jamieson Canada 14 173 1.3× 17 0.2× 79 1.1× 83 1.2× 124 1.9× 43 490
Aloísio José Bedone Brazil 14 116 0.9× 16 0.2× 38 0.6× 61 0.9× 86 1.3× 27 390
Rachid Bekkali Morocco 13 110 0.8× 295 3.8× 27 0.4× 56 0.8× 20 0.3× 38 483
Soo Hyun Kim South Korea 11 78 0.6× 155 2.0× 51 0.7× 31 0.5× 211 3.3× 31 494
Benjamin J. Peipert United States 10 71 0.5× 92 1.2× 119 1.7× 80 1.2× 9 0.1× 27 410
Zijun Liao China 11 69 0.5× 52 0.7× 33 0.5× 38 0.6× 37 0.6× 32 319

Countries citing papers authored by Mavis Machirori

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mavis Machirori's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mavis Machirori with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mavis Machirori more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mavis Machirori

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mavis Machirori. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mavis Machirori. The network helps show where Mavis Machirori may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mavis Machirori

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mavis Machirori. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mavis Machirori based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mavis Machirori. Mavis Machirori is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Machirori, Mavis, et al.. (2022). Unpacking race and ethnicity in African genomics research. Nature Reviews Genetics. 23(8). 455–456. 4 indexed citations
2.
Vears, Danya F., Joel T. Minion, James Cummings, et al.. (2021). Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS ONE. 16(11). e0258646–e0258646. 34 indexed citations
3.
Vears, Danya F., et al.. (2021). Views on Genomic Research Result Delivery Methods and Informed Consent: A Review. Personalized Medicine. 18(3). 295–310. 2 indexed citations
4.
Machirori, Mavis, Christine Patch, & Alison Metcalfe. (2021). “It didn’t mean anything” – moving within a landscape of knowledge to interpret genetics and genetic test results within familial cancer concerns. New Genetics and Society. 40(4). 570–598. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Bellafante, Elena, Vanya Nikolova, Jenny Chambers, et al.. (2020). Maternal glucose homeostasis is impaired in mouse models of gestational cholestasis. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 11523–11523. 12 indexed citations
7.
Machirori, Mavis, Christine Patch, & Alison Metcalfe. (2018). Study of the relationship between Black men, culture and prostate cancer beliefs. Cogent Medicine. 5(1). 1442636–1442636. 12 indexed citations
8.
Machirori, Mavis, Christine Patch, & Alison Metcalfe. (2018). Black and Minority Ethnic women's decision-making for risk reduction strategies after BRCA testing: Use of context and knowledge. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 62(5). 376–384. 9 indexed citations
9.
Dove, Edward S., Susan Kelly, Federica Lucivero, et al.. (2017). Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research?. Clinical Ethics. 12(3). 150–165. 131 indexed citations
10.
Martineau, Marcus, Christina Raker, Peter Dixon, et al.. (2014). The Metabolic Profile of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy Is Associated With Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Dyslipidemia, and Increased Fetal Growth. Diabetes Care. 38(2). 243–248. 105 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026