Janet Lee
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Public Administration top 2%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Co-authors
- Warwick FunnellJuliana NgAldónio FerreiraRalph KoberGreg ShailerJin-Ok KimChristy BoscardinZenaida Aguirre‐Muñoz
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Janet Lee
35 papers receiving 595 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Strategy and Management 191
- Public Administration 191
- Management Information Systems 158
- Accounting 153
- Political Science and International Relations 117
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Lee. The network helps show where Janet Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Lee. Janet Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluative Thinking: Using Results-Oriented Reasoning to Strengthen Collaboration. | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | The parenting practices and child outcomes of Korean immigrant mothers with different acculturative strategies | 8 |
| 8 | The Parenting Practices and Child Social Emotional Outcomes of Korean Immigrant Mothers with Different Acculturation Strategies | 1 |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Janet Lee
Janet Lee is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Public Administration and Management Information Systems, having authored 40 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (191 citations), Management Information Systems (158 citations) and Accounting (153 citations). Janet Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Warwick Funnell, Juliana Ng, Aldónio Ferreira, Ralph Kober, Greg Shailer, Jin-Ok Kim, Christy Boscardin, Zenaida Aguirre‐Muñoz, Charissa S. L. Cheah and Sevgi Bayram Özdemir. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Gender & Society and The British Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.