David J. Lilly

1.1k total citations
49 papers, 826 citations indexed

About

David J. Lilly is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Lilly has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 826 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Sensory Systems and 11 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in David J. Lilly's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers). David J. Lilly is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers). David J. Lilly collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. David J. Lilly's co-authors include Janet E. Shanks, F. Owen Black, Robert H. Withnell, Jack M. Kartush, Stefan Stenfelt, John J. Rosowski, John L. Kemink, Susan Pesznecker, Shawn S. Goodman and R.J. Peterka and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Anesthesiology and The Laryngoscope.

In The Last Decade

David J. Lilly

48 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David J. Lilly United States 18 425 355 297 294 110 49 826
Vincent N. Carrasco United States 15 374 0.9× 304 0.9× 201 0.7× 184 0.6× 196 1.8× 28 885
Walter Di Nardo Italy 19 414 1.0× 417 1.2× 297 1.0× 162 0.6× 42 0.4× 63 939
E Lehnhardt Germany 13 467 1.1× 575 1.6× 177 0.6× 274 0.9× 48 0.4× 105 917
Christopher F. Halpin United States 18 686 1.6× 730 2.1× 432 1.5× 351 1.2× 71 0.6× 29 1.3k
B. Meyer France 20 382 0.9× 576 1.6× 185 0.6× 103 0.4× 125 1.1× 62 1.0k
David Whinney United Kingdom 11 287 0.7× 217 0.6× 235 0.8× 135 0.5× 40 0.4× 20 536
I. Klockhoff Sweden 19 555 1.3× 258 0.7× 647 2.2× 172 0.6× 119 1.1× 34 1.1k
Béla Büki Austria 18 564 1.3× 310 0.9× 611 2.1× 139 0.5× 121 1.1× 58 1.1k
R.-D. Battmer Germany 17 455 1.1× 680 1.9× 70 0.2× 258 0.9× 69 0.6× 54 846
María Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gómez Brazil 16 329 0.8× 481 1.4× 55 0.2× 156 0.5× 87 0.8× 88 776

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Lilly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Lilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Lilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Lilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Lilly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Lilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Lilly. The network helps show where David J. Lilly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Lilly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Lilly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Lilly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Lilly. David J. Lilly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feeney, M. Patrick, Lisa L. Hunter, Joseph Kei, et al.. (2013). Consensus Statement. Ear and Hearing. 34(Supplement 1). 78s–79s. 44 indexed citations
2.
Rosowski, John J., Stefan Stenfelt, & David J. Lilly. (2013). An Overview of Wideband Immittance Measurements Techniques and Terminology. Ear and Hearing. 34(Supplement 1). 9s–16s. 45 indexed citations
3.
Lilly, David J. & Robert H. Margolis. (2013). Wideband Acoustic Immittance Measurements of the Middle Ear. Ear and Hearing. 34(Supplement 1). 4s–8s. 7 indexed citations
4.
Lilly, David J., et al.. (2011). Development of a “Virtual Cocktail Party” for the Measurement of Speech Intelligibility in a Sound Field. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 22(5). 294–305. 5 indexed citations
5.
Lewis, Martyn, Frederick J. Gallun, Jane S. Gordon, David J. Lilly, & Carl C. Crandell. (2010). A Pilot Investigation Regarding Speech-Recognition Performance in Noise for Adults with Hearing Loss in the FM+HA Listening Condition. The Volta Review. 110(1). 31–54. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lewis, Martyn, David J. Lilly, Dennis Bourdette, et al.. (2010). Audiometric hearing status of individuals with and without multiple sclerosis. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 47(7). 669–669. 9 indexed citations
7.
Lilly, David J., et al.. (2006). Frequency-Modulation (FM) Technology as a Method for Improving Speech Perception in Noise for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 17(8). 605–616. 15 indexed citations
8.
Lewis, Martyn, et al.. (2006). Some effects of multiple sclerosis on speech perception in noise: Preliminary findings. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 43(1). 91–91. 7 indexed citations
9.
Goodman, Shawn S., Robert H. Withnell, Egbert de Boer, David J. Lilly, & Alfred L. Nuttall. (2004). Cochlear delays measured with amplitude-modulated tone-burst-evoked OAEs. Hearing Research. 188(1-2). 57–69. 16 indexed citations
10.
Withnell, Robert H., et al.. (2003). Sources and Mechanisms of DPOAE Generation: Implications for the Prediction of Auditory Sensitivity. Ear and Hearing. 24(5). 367–379. 70 indexed citations
11.
Robertson, Lee T., et al.. (2003). Vibration perception thresholds of human maxillary and mandibular central incisors. Archives of Oral Biology. 48(4). 309–316. 21 indexed citations
12.
Sato, Eisuke, Tsutomu Nakashima, David J. Lilly, et al.. (2002). Tympanometric Findings in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueducts. The Laryngoscope. 112(9). 1642–1646. 37 indexed citations
13.
Margolis, Robert H., et al.. (1992). Tympanic Electrocochleography: Normal and Abnormal Patterns of Response. International Journal of Audiology. 31(1). 8–24. 25 indexed citations
14.
Lusk, Rodney P., et al.. (1990). Pressure-induced modifications of the acoustic nerve Part I: The acoustic reflex. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 11(6). 398–406. 4 indexed citations
15.
Black, F. Owen, David J. Lilly, Robert J. Peterka, et al.. (1990). The Dynamic Posturographic Pressure Test for the Presumptive Diagnosis of Perilymph Fistulas. Neurologic Clinics. 8(2). 361–374. 9 indexed citations
16.
Kartush, Jack M., David J. Lilly, & John L. Kemink. (1985). Facial Electroneurography: Clinical and Experimental Investigations. Otolaryngology. 93(4). 516–523. 55 indexed citations
17.
Samra, Satwant K., et al.. (1984). Fentanyl Anesthesia and Human Brain-stem Auditory Evoked Potentials. Anesthesiology. 61(3). 261–265. 27 indexed citations
18.
Gorga, Michael P., Paul J. Abbas, & David J. Lilly. (1980). Magnitude of the acoustic reflex for either homophasic (0°) or antiphasic (180°) binaural activating signals presented in a background of noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 67(2). 589–593. 3 indexed citations
19.
Lilly, David J., et al.. (1971). Dynamic Characteristics of Air-Pressure Measuring Systems Used in Speech Research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 50(4A). 1051–1057. 10 indexed citations
20.
Lilly, David J.. (1964). Some Properties of the Acoustic Reflex in Man. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 36(10_Supplement). 2007–2007. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026