Janet C. Sherman

4.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
50 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Janet C. Sherman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet C. Sherman has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Janet C. Sherman's work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Brain Metastases and Treatment (6 papers). Janet C. Sherman is often cited by papers focused on Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Brain Metastases and Treatment (6 papers). Janet C. Sherman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and China. Janet C. Sherman's co-authors include Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Jeffrey B. Weilburg, Franziska Hoche, Márk Vangel, Xavier Guell, Nikos Makris, Jason MacMore, Catherine J. Stoodley, David Schoenfeld and Beverly M. K. Biller and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Janet C. Sherman

48 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

The neuropsychiatry of th... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet C. Sherman United States 21 676 669 411 403 341 50 2.7k
John D. Port United States 32 344 0.5× 778 1.2× 409 1.0× 503 1.2× 436 1.3× 114 3.2k
Tracy Butler United States 27 554 0.8× 818 1.2× 1.0k 2.5× 640 1.6× 352 1.0× 92 3.5k
Rudie Kortekaas Netherlands 22 402 0.6× 557 0.8× 333 0.8× 694 1.7× 126 0.4× 50 2.5k
Gao‐Jun Teng China 31 480 0.7× 1.5k 2.2× 226 0.5× 391 1.0× 873 2.6× 73 3.1k
Caroline Hommet France 25 291 0.4× 701 1.0× 392 1.0× 888 2.2× 195 0.6× 106 2.4k
Lars Frings Germany 27 420 0.6× 710 1.1× 315 0.8× 793 2.0× 357 1.0× 93 2.3k
Peter Seres Canada 29 197 0.3× 855 1.3× 468 1.1× 353 0.9× 776 2.3× 88 2.5k
Freimut D. Juengling Germany 29 249 0.4× 597 0.9× 578 1.4× 433 1.1× 401 1.2× 76 2.6k
Mustafa K. Başkaya United States 34 448 0.7× 471 0.7× 733 1.8× 204 0.5× 206 0.6× 179 3.7k
Gian Luigi Lenzi Italy 29 361 0.5× 1.3k 2.0× 279 0.7× 713 1.8× 363 1.1× 74 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Janet C. Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet C. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet C. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet C. Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet C. Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet C. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet C. Sherman. The network helps show where Janet C. Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet C. Sherman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet C. Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet C. Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet C. Sherman. Janet C. Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sherman, Janet C., et al.. (2025). The Cerebellar Neuropsychiatric Rating Scale. The Cerebellum. 24(2). 56–56. 3 indexed citations
2.
Winter, Sebastian, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Helen A. Shih, et al.. (2024). Brain volume loss after cranial irradiation: a controlled comparison study between photon vs proton radiotherapy for WHO grade 2–3 gliomas. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 171(2). 351–363. 3 indexed citations
4.
Pulsifer, Margaret B., et al.. (2021). The development and implementation of teleneuropsychology in an academic lifespan neuropsychology center: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 43(8). 774–785. 6 indexed citations
5.
Parsons, Michael, Katharina Hoebel, Andrew Beers, et al.. (2018). NCOG-04. EFFECTS OF PROTON RADIATION ON BRAIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN LOW GRADE GLIOMA. Neuro-Oncology. 20(suppl_6). vi173–vi173. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hoche, Franziska, et al.. (2018). The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Ataxia-Telangiectasia. The Cerebellum. 18(2). 225–244. 19 indexed citations
7.
Sherman, Janet C.. (2017). Is There a Language Prodrome for Alzheimer's Disease? A Clinical Perspective. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hoche, Franziska, Xavier Guell, Márk Vangel, Janet C. Sherman, & Jeremy D. Schmahmann. (2017). The cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome scale. Brain. 141(1). 248–270. 302 indexed citations
9.
Sims, Katherine B., Andrew J. Cole, Janet C. Sherman, Paul A. Caruso, & Matija Snuderl. (2011). Case 8-2011. New England Journal of Medicine. 364(11). 1062–1074. 8 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Bin, Ming Tian, Zhen Yu, et al.. (2011). The Effects of Isoflurane and Desflurane on Cognitive Function in Humans. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 114(2). 410–415. 74 indexed citations
11.
Schmahmann, Jeremy D., Jeffrey B. Weilburg, & Janet C. Sherman. (2007). The neuropsychiatry of the cerebellum — insights from the clinic. The Cerebellum. 6(3). 254–267. 519 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Miller, Karen K., Beverly M. K. Biller, Caroline Beauregard, et al.. (2006). Effects of Testosterone Replacement in Androgen-Deficient Women with Hypopituitarism: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 91(5). 1683–1690. 111 indexed citations
13.
McCloskey, Michael, Jussi Valtonen, & Janet C. Sherman. (2006). Representing orientation: A coordinate-system hypothesis and evidence from developmental deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 23(5). 680–713. 20 indexed citations
14.
Baum, Howard B. A., Laurence Katznelson, Janet C. Sherman, et al.. (1998). Effects of Physiological Growth Hormone (GH) Therapy on Cognition and Quality of Life in Patients with Adult-Onset GH Deficiency1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 83(9). 3184–3189. 150 indexed citations
15.
Sherman, Janet C., Bridgid Lai Fui Chin, Paul D. T. Huibers, Ricard Garcia‐Valls, & T. Alan Hatton. (1998). Solvent replacement for green processing.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 106(suppl 1). 253–271. 74 indexed citations
16.
Schmahmann, Jeremy D. & Janet C. Sherman. (1997). Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome. International review of neurobiology. 41. 433–440. 245 indexed citations
17.
Kalkanis, Steven N., et al.. (1996). Delayed Complications Thirty‐Six Years After Hemispherectomy: A Case Report. Epilepsia. 37(8). 758–762. 8 indexed citations
18.
Sherman, Janet C. & Barbara Lust. (1993). Children are in control. Cognition. 46(1). 1–51. 48 indexed citations
19.
Sherman, Janet C., et al.. (1989). Syntactic and semantic contributions to sentence comprehension in agrammatism. Brain and Language. 37(3). 419–439. 26 indexed citations
20.
Sherman, Janet C.. (1983). The acquisition of control in complement sentences : the role of structural and lexical factors. University Microfilms International eBooks. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026