Meghan Mitchell

20 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers

Meghan Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 413
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 241
  • Health 95
Replace Nichole L. Saunders with:
Nichole L. Saunders Australia
Janessa O. Carvalho United States
Sarah C. Marshall United States
Y. Tang United States
Iris Rawtaer Singapore
Anna MacKay‐Brandt United States
Sarah Farias United States
Brian P. Yochim United States
Simona Sacuiu Sweden
Cássio M.C. Bottino Brazil
Meghan Mitchell relative to Nichole L. Saunders Australia Nichole L. Saunders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nichole L. Saunders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meghan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan Mitchell. The network helps show where Meghan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meghan Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meghan Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Meghan Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011159
2 200866
3 201265
4 201258
5 201250
6 201241
7 201240
8 201040
9 201239
10 200837
11 201135
12 201220
13 201318
14 20159
15 20177
16 20107
17 20232
18 20241
19 20141
20 20141

About Meghan Mitchell

Meghan Mitchell is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Physiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (99 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (413 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (49 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (241 citations) and Health (95 citations). Meghan Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. Stephen Miller, Alireza Atri, Steven D. Shirk, Lynn Shaughnessy, Janet C. Sherman, Sandra Weıntraub, Joseph J. Locascio, Donald G. McLaren, Lovingly Quitania Park and Julene K. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aging Research, Brain Imaging and Behavior, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society and Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact