Mong‐Lin Yu

596 citations
62 papers · 385 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mong‐Lin Yu

58 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Mong‐Lin Yu
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Occupational Therapy 66
  • Clinical Psychology 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
  • Emergency Medical Services 33
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 53
Replace Anna van der Gaag with:
Anna van der Gaag United Kingdom
Kris Pizur‐Barnekow United States
Elizabeth Blesedell Crepeau United States
Diane Behl United States
Rosa Seijo United States
Steve Hoppes United States
Erinn H. Finke United States
Mary Lawlor United States
Gabrielle T. Lee Canada
Loree A. Primeau United States
Mong‐Lin Yu relative to Anna van der Gaag United Kingdom Anna van der Gaag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Anna van der Gaag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mong‐Lin Yu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mong‐Lin Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mong‐Lin Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mong‐Lin Yu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mong‐Lin Yu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mong‐Lin Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mong‐Lin Yu. The network helps show where Mong‐Lin Yu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mong‐Lin Yu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mong‐Lin Yu Line = papers co-authored together Mong‐Lin Yu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201918
2 201918
3 201817
4 202217
5 201816
6 201815
7 202013
8 202012
9 202012
10 201112
11 201011
12 201111
13 202111
14 201811
15 202310
16 20219
17 20129
18 20179
19 20179
20 20218

About Mong‐Lin Yu

Mong‐Lin Yu is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy, Education and General Health Professions, having authored 62 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (16 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (16 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Child Therapy and Development (7 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (66 citations), Clinical Psychology (133 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Emergency Medical Services (33 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (53 citations). Mong‐Lin Yu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Ted Brown, Jamie Etherington, Michele Haynes, Jenny Ziviani, Stephen Isbel, Janeen Baxter, Andrew M. H. Siu, Aislinn Lalor, Jane Cooper and Ellie Fossey. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, International Journal of Play, Research in Developmental Disabilities and American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact