Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Webster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Webster. The network helps show where Jane Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Webster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Webster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Webster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Webster. Jane Webster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dennis, Alan R., Dennis F. Galletta, & Jane Webster. (2023). Fake News on the Internet.1 indexed citations
Webster, Jane, et al.. (2018). Personalization of an Environmental Message: Developing a Measure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
6.
Staples, D. Sandy, et al.. (2017). COMPARING GOAL SETTING APPROACHES TO BOOST COMPUTER-RELATED PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS. European Conference on Information Systems. 1264.
7.
Khan, Ali & Jane Webster. (2017). Digital Game Narrative Quality: Developing a Measure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.5 indexed citations
8.
Veit, Daniel, et al.. (2015). Gamification – A Novel Phenomenon or a New Wrapping for Existing Concepts?. OPUS (Augsburg University).23 indexed citations
Zou, Yi & Jane Webster. (2014). INFORMATION OVERLOAD IN USING CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 235.6 indexed citations
11.
Guinea, Ana Ortíz de & Jane Webster. (2014). Overcoming Variance and Process Distinctions in Information Systems Research. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
Webster, Jane, et al.. (2003). Roman Imperialism and Provincial Art. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester).23 indexed citations
14.
Webster, Jane. (2002). EXECUTIVE OVERVIEWS Volume 26 Iss. 4. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 26(4). 2.7 indexed citations
15.
Webster, Jane. (1998). Desktop Videoconferencing: Experiences of Complete Users,. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 22(3). 2.9 indexed citations
16.
Compeau, Deborah, Lorne Olfman, Maung K. Sein, & Jane Webster. (1995). End-User Training and Learning - Introduction to the Special Section.. Communications of the ACM. 38. 24–26.2 indexed citations
17.
Webster, Jane, et al.. (1990). Computer Training and Computer Anxiety in the Educational Process: an Experimental Analysis.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 34.37 indexed citations
18.
Lamphear, John & Jane Webster. (1971). The Jie-Acholi War: Oral Evidence from Two Sides of the Battle Front. 35. 23–42.2 indexed citations
Webster, Jane. (1965). The African churches. 254–266.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.