Flavio D’Abramo
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Patient Dignity and Privacy
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 7
- Travel-related health issues 1
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 6
- Co-authors
- Jochen Vollmann (1 shared paper)Jan Schildmann (1 shared paper)Višnja Katić (2 shared papers)Heidi Beate Bentzen (2 shared papers)Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne (2 shared papers)Deborah Mascalzoni (2 shared papers)Jane Kaye (2 shared papers)Erica Jones (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biopreservation and Biobanking (2 papers)BMC Medical Ethics (2 papers)Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine (1 paper)PLoS Biology (1 paper)Postcolonial Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Flavio D’Abramo
13 papers receiving 389 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health Informatics 28
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 288
- Physiology 145
- General Health Professions 97
- Safety Research 19
Countries citing papers authored by Flavio D’Abramo
This map shows the geographic impact of Flavio D’Abramo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flavio D’Abramo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flavio D’Abramo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Flavio D’Abramo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flavio D’Abramo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flavio D’Abramo. The network helps show where Flavio D’Abramo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Flavio D’Abramo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 13 | Political Epistemology of Pandemic Management | 2021 | 1 |
| 14 | Anthropocene in the Cell | 2019 | 1 |
About Flavio D’Abramo
Flavio D’Abramo is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Travel-related health issues (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper) and Global Security and Public Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (288 citations), Physiology (145 citations), General Health Professions (97 citations) and Safety Research (19 citations). Flavio D’Abramo has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Vollmann, Jan Schildmann, Višnja Katić, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne, Deborah Mascalzoni, Jane Kaye, Erica Jones, Amy Simpson and M K Javaid. Their work appears in journals such as Biopreservation and Biobanking, BMC Medical Ethics, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, PLoS Biology and Postcolonial Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.