Jane G. Tillman
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Physiology
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 10%
- Co-authors
- Julian H. BarthJennifer L. StevensA. Jill ClemenceJohn MüllerChristopher J. HopwoodNicole M. CainMichael J. RochePhilip S. Wong
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (11 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers)
- Journals
- Personality and Individual DifferencesComprehensive PsychiatrySuicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane G. Tillman
26 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 150
- Social Psychology 54
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Physiology 34
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 26
Countries citing papers authored by Jane G. Tillman
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane G. Tillman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane G. Tillman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane G. Tillman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane G. Tillman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane G. Tillman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane G. Tillman. The network helps show where Jane G. Tillman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane G. Tillman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane G. Tillman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane G. Tillman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane G. Tillman. Jane G. Tillman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | The Impact of Patient Suicide on Clinicians | 1 |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The embodied subject : minding the body in psychoanalysis | 15 |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Jane G. Tillman
Jane G. Tillman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Psychology and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (11 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (15 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations) and Family Practice (14 citations). Jane G. Tillman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julian H. Barth, Jennifer L. Stevens, A. Jill Clemence, John Müller, Christopher J. Hopwood, Nicole M. Cain, Michael J. Roche, Philip S. Wong, Kevin B. Meehan and David Reiss. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.